TownieDeac
words are futile devices
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 76,189
- Reaction score
- 16,923
thousands of children would have suffered even more
Stripping away all the nonsense, you think the bill helped kids?
thousands of children would have suffered even more
Disagree. Plus Omar already nailed it.
“Throwing more money at the very organizations committing human rights abuses—and the very Administration directing these human rights abuses—is not a solution," she said. "This is a humanitarian crisis—a humanitarian crisis inflicted by our own leadership. It's also a refugee crisis fueled by state violence, corruption, and impunity in the Northern Triangle--one that this Administration has only fueled through mass deportation and slashing aid."
And we're gonna get more mass deportations this week regardless.
For the Gen X and slightly older posters from non-Boomer generations, do you remember the generations older than Boomers being so terrified of boomers that they tried to sabotage them and keep them from gaining power? This seems like a fairly unique phenomenon. Boomers raised us telling us that we could be anything we wanted and yet when we try, they seem to put their hands on our heads and say, “whoa there skippy, go back to your avocado toast, we’re still in charge”
And not doing anything would have made matters worse. There would have been less food, less toiletries and more repression.
Not doing the deal may have made the mass deportations even worse. We've seen how Trump reacts.
She's flat out wrong.
Except us older guys like Mayor Pete and Kamala Harris.
Does anyone give up power without a fight? It's there for you to take. Go for it. Don't wimp out.
But be prepared for taking the power. Have rational plans in place. Eight years ago, ACA had about a 30% approval rating. It's now over 50% and growing. People now like the idea of a public option (which is the next step to universal).
It can't be all or nothing.
Regardless of the whiners, we've done our part. Take the power from us like we did from our parents and grandparents.
This exchange may sound dull and technical. But the congresswoman’s point has real human stakes. America’s central bank has a dual mandate: to promote full employment and price stability. How the Fed chooses to balance those two objectives has redistributive implications. The wealthy have far more to lose from inflation than they do from modest levels of unemployment. In fact, many business owners may actually prefer for the U.S. economy not to achieve full employment, since workers tend to be less demanding when jobs are scarce. By contrast, the most vulnerable workers in the U.S. — such as those with criminal records or little experience — will struggle to get a foothold in the labor market unless policy makers err on the side of letting unemployment fall “too low.”
And this is what AOC’s questions are implicitly about. If the Federal Reserve believes that the U.S. economy cannot sustain unemployment below 5 percent without suffering high inflation, then it will raise interest rates to cool off investment, thereby preventing too many workers from getting jobs. Ocasio-Cortez’s implication is that, by raising interest rates out of a fear of illusory inflation, the Fed may have needlessly hurt American workers. Powell’s concession on that point is significant, and suggests that the central bank will be less inclined to err on the side of hurting the vulnerable in the future.
Rashida Tlaib asked an equally probing question. The Michigan congresswoman noted that during the financial crisis, the Fed had intervened in the commercial paper market to assist corporations. She then asked if the central bank would consider doing a similar favor for state and municipal governments in a future recession.
Posts this. Complains about AOC doing exactly the above. K.
I love avocado, but for real, what am I missing with the whole avocado toast thing. It’s pretty meh.
I used to think the same thing. I use spicy guacamole. Game changer.
I love avocado, but for real, what am I missing with the whole avocado toast thing. It’s pretty meh.
For the Gen X and slightly older posters from non-Boomer generations, do you remember the generations older than Boomers being so terrified of boomers that they tried to sabotage them and keep them from gaining power? This seems like a fairly unique phenomenon. Boomers raised us telling us that we could be anything we wanted and yet when we try, they seem to put their hands on our heads and say, “whoa there skippy, go back to your avocado toast, we’re still in charge”