Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
It's hard to evaluate a Donald-Bernie election because we don't know who would run as a third party (and someone certainly would) or how that person would siphon votes from the two major candidates.
Pence definitely helped Trump.
It's hard to evaluate a Donald-Bernie election because we don't know who would run as a third party (and someone certainly would) or how that person would siphon votes from the two major candidates.
Disagree. Pence was fairly disgraced after that IN bathroom bill fiasco. Right wingers were pissed he caved and didn't support the bill he originally signed, and the business community didn't completely trust him. And liberals despise him. Only thing he did was further convince evangelicals Trump was their guy, but they were already pretty convinced of that.
Brown is loved in OH. He could have turned that state and if he campaigned in PA, WI and MI, he could have had an impact just by showing up.
Pence definitely helped Trump.
Trump wouldn’t lose any support to a 3rd party candidate. His party loves him.
Pence turned out evangelicals after the access Hollywood had them slightly conflicted. Pence definitely helped.
Access Hollywood unfortunately didn't move the needle. Maybe he helped reassure evangelicals, but they weren't exactly wavering in their support of Trump.
Agree with your 1st sentence. He's got 40% or so solidly behind him pretty much no matter what. A damning Mueller report? Nah, won't significantly move the needle. Neither will a pee pee tape. The only thing that would result in a significant drop off is a bad recession.
Don't care the extent to which Brown is loved in OH. She lost OH by 8%. Brown on that ticket doesn't make a 9 point difference.
If Dems don’t realize Cory Booker sucks by now, then we might as well just hand Trump another term and save ourselves the anxiety.
He's been up 15-20% throughout this election.
He wouldn't have had to change 9%. He would have had to change 4% +1. By costing Trump that amount, she would have won.
-4+1 vote
Trump 54 49.9999
Hillary 46 50.0001
Your premise is grossly in error.
Trump won a smaller % of the popular vote than Romney, and Trump is less popular now than he was in 2016. The "enthusiasm" among his base isn't important. 1 excited racist voter is still only 1 vote. What was important about Trump was his appeal to the rust belt, countered by Hillary's lack of turnout in the rust belt. Hypothetically, you really think Trump beats 3rd term Obama?Yes Obama won, and now 100% of the right's enthusiasm is stoked in racism and/or misogyny. Nominate the white dude. You only need like two tenths of a percent in a couple states. Bernie would win in a landslide, for example.
pretty funny calculations from a guy who says a vote for third-party candidates was a vote for Trump
It's way, way, way to early but here's how I'd have the Dems ranked by odds as of today (and will dramatically change by mid-19):
Biden 4/1
Harris 6/1
Warren 10/1
Bernie 10/1
Klobuchar 12/1
Gillibrand 15/1
Booker 15/1
Oprah 7/1
Joe Kennedy 15/1
Beto (if wins)12/1
Al Gore will be a spry 72.
As I've said over and over again, Dems need to nominate someone 50ish.
It's nice that you have finally gotten to the Sherrod Brown party and the Hillary/Sherrod ticket.
ahhh...I was calling for Brown in 15/16...