He's arguing for the status quo.
He's saying if you can't stop all crime there's no reason to create legitimate laws that will stop some.
He's saying the the gun industry doesn't have special status regarding liability. Of course everyone but the gun industry says he's wrong.
He's saying a gun registry will lead to confiscation.
He's saying that in spite the indisputable evidence from the sites that stopping to reload saved lives in Tuscon, Newtown and in other mass shootings that we shouldn't limit magazines and that magazines are covered by the 2nd Amendment (that's really bizarre).
My guess is most of the board is on my side.
Wow, quit you day job as a psychic...