For posterity, some guesses on maxes - mine: Oliver (6) 12 teams, Biles (73) 4 , Garey (UR) 3 . Not mine: Pribble (1) 25 , Flores (2) 18 , Boucher (39 - Stillwater dropped) 6.
The bad news: my guesses were way off.
The good news: recruiting is in good shape. Oliver: 7/7, Biles 1/1, Garey Cl. In the net, I have a 0/0, two 0/x, and 5 ties at 15 or 16.
I'll be on:
Oliver (scoring has fallen off, and its not great value but we have the points to spend...not sure what to expect with the new scouting system but, best guess: 6'6 ggggfg)
Biles (6'6 gfefgf? on a killer hs team w/ a stud pg, not sure what to make of his stats)
Garey (looks pretty similar to Oliver overall, thrilled to have him as a Cl: 6'6 gggggf. SF ideally though may be forced into PF or even an undersized C)
Michael Landon r29 net 0/0 ( e sct: 6'8 GFff(f)G, looks like def or hands could bump though. Frontcourt bench scorer most likely.)
Bradley Copeland r5 net 0/3 (6'8 fggggf?, interested to see how this plays out he's e+ win and I lead three top 40 teams for his services. Going to max him the rest of the way.)
Definitely wishing I'd been a bit more aggressive as a couple netters I considered bumping to 32 but chickened out on would have been leads for me (11 Parker, 17 Norris). We should land a nice class regardless.
Overall, I'm a bit confused by the outcome in recruiting. The higher end maxes weren't nearly as contested as I expected, but the net wasn't as competitive as I remember league 5 being (granted, that was several years ago so I'm not sure how much I can trust my memory). I suppose that means I just badly overestimated the amount of maxes that were out there, but the points still have to end up
somewhere.