In all seriousness, I did read the piece and it is generally what I expected it to be - offbase and misguided. She points to Obama's being black as the reason for Trump's election. That doesn't make sense, if it did then he wouldn't have been elected a second time. Instead, she should have pointed to his failed primary policy as the reason for Trump's election. Obama staggered Obamacare so that its primary components wouldn't take affect until after his second election. Trump ran on anti-Obamacare, which swayed enough people in the middle to get elected (plus, Hillary). Obama's primary policy was idiotic and the country hated it, so the country elected someone who claimed he would get rid of it. That is something virtuous about democracy, not something to be discredited.
She then does the typical left-wing ramble against enforcing immigration, drug, and crime laws, attempting to paint the violators of those laws as saints just caught in a great entrapment scheme, completely ignoring the conscious acts and decisions of the offenders. Tough to take positions like that seriously.