Strickland33
Well-known member
I think it is pretty clear if you read his manifesto that his intention was to commit an act of racial terrorism. The whole mental health angle is complete BS. This dude was no more crazy than anyone else who murders innocent people. People need to stop making excuses for racist assholes because it doesn't fit their social paradigm. That includes people on both sides of the political aisle.
And that's fine, but that manifesto is batshit crazy. It moves between justifying mass murder, racial terrorism, and workplace violence. Regardless of which element you latch on to, it's a contradictory document (as most murderers' post-hoc manifestos tend to be). There isn't the cold rationality that was a facet in Dylann Roof's justification or even in the DC Sniper cases (just to give examples of white and black racial terrorism).
I agree with all of you that racial terrorism cuts both ways, but this just doesn't seem like the perfect case on which to base that point. If he shot up a WalMart in a white suburb, then perhaps, but he knew both of his victims and had blamed them and their conduct (no matter how long ago this happened) for contributing to his harassment and firing.