I mean this would be true if it were "hold your nose and vote for" Donald, but 90 percent of self-identified Republicans have a "favorable" view of him. So this isn't true.
The whole "Christian" World View (which is not all Christians, of course, just Evangelical/Fundamentalist and conservative Catholic) would be more credible on pro-life issues if they and their party seemed to give a damn about the baby and mother once the child was born, rather than cutting social services and child welfare programs all the time, and if they were actively using government to make it easier to adopt. Looking at the GOP record, it's hard not to conclude that the real Religious Right attitude towards abortion and infants is "Well, honey, we're going to use the government to force you to have that baby, but once it's born you and the kid are on your own. Good Luck!" That's not very pro-life when you look at it.
As to opposition to socialism, that would also be more credible if it wasn't for the fact that tens of millions of older conservative Christians are living on Social Security and Medicare, two social welfare programs, and without them many of these people couldn't survive. And the GOP, btw, bitterly opposed both programs at the time they were created, and claimed they were socialist, or worse. Yet now the GOP olds love them. I have no doubt (and, in fact, know from experience) that many conservatives are indeed sincere in their opposition to the pro-choice position on abortion, and to what they think is "socialism", yet those beliefs are often contradictory, don't really stand up to scrutiny, and don't match their actions in accepting social welfare programs or helping infants (and their mothers) once they're born.
ETA: On abortion, I should also have added the Religious Right's opposition to teaching practical sex ed and birth control information is hypocritical too. If they really wanted to reduce unwanted pregnancies (and thus abortions), they should be in support of freely teaching birth control information. Instead, in most cases they vigorously oppose it and push "abstinence-only" in spite of the evidence that it doesn't work. It's almost as if their goal is to have lots of women having lots of babies, wanted or not.