DeaconSig
Well-known member
Have you read the doc yet?
Lol
Have you read the doc yet?
2018: FBI agents stating plainly that they are openly trying to "stop" the democratic process of the people electing the POTUS.
-MEH NOTHING BURGURZZZZZZ11!!!1!!
If you actually READ something, you would know they went after Bernie, Hillary, Ryan, Sessions and others. You'd also know they were taken off anything to do with the project within 24 hours.
But why be bothered with knowing the whole story when you have so definitively taken a position?
I haven't read it yet but I'll probably like the parts you lefties don't.
2018: FBI agents stating plainly that they are openly trying to "stop" the democratic process of the people electing the POTUS.
-MEH NOTHING BURGURZZZZZZ11!!!1!!
Defenders of the FBI have long argued that Page and Strzok were radical outliers in the culture of the FBI headquarters. These revelations make that a more difficult case. Could someone rise to senior levels of the FBI if these views, and the language used to express, were far out of the mainstream? Their behavior presents a grotesque caricature of what we taxpayers should expect from federal law enforcement.
The “conduct of these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation and sowed doubt about the FBI’s work on, and its handling of, the Midyear investigation,” the inspector general concluded. “The damage caused by these employees’ actions extends far beyond the scope of the Midyear investigation and goes to the heart of the FBI’s reputation for neutral factfinding and political independence.”
Only headlines and lefty tears count
It’s amazing how you all can deny the sum total of this greatly benefited Trump.
I found this one to be hilarious.
“And then there’s this heartfelt string of missives from Agent 1 to Agent 5 on November 8, 2016—election day: “You should know; … that I’m … with her.” (The IG helpfully adds in a footnote that “’I’m with her’ was one of the Clinton campaign slogans.”)”
The ... between “I’m” and “with” specifically means Agent 1 didn’t say “I’m with her.”
So is the point of all this that FBI agents shouldn’t have a voting preference, that they shouldn’t text about their voting preferences, or that they shouldn’t have had a preference for Hillary?
I haven't read it yet but I'll probably like the parts you lefties don't.
It’s amazing how you all can deny the sum total of this greatly benefited Trump.
I found this one to be hilarious.
“And then there’s this heartfelt string of missives from Agent 1 to Agent 5 on November 8, 2016—election day: “You should know; … that I’m … with her.” (The IG helpfully adds in a footnote that “’I’m with her’ was one of the Clinton campaign slogans.”)”
The ... between “I’m” and “with” specifically means Agent 1 didn’t say “I’m with her.”
So is the point of all this that FBI agents shouldn’t have a voting preference, that they shouldn’t text about their voting preferences, or that they shouldn’t have had a preference for Hillary?