morrison2951
Well-known member
I'm so much better than most all of you folks since I attended Wake when we were actually ranked at or near #1 (Regional Liberal Arts), so put that in your pipe and smoke it USN&WR 2023 rankings!
It's a huge sign to me that larger schools paid for this change.
how many #nosat posters are thereI'm putting the blame squarely on our younger posters' shoulders.
The school hasn’t gotten worse, USNews just changed the way they calculated the score, giving more weight to things that benefited big state school.I’m not really following the logic of how a random group of universities “paid” for these changes. Seems more like sour grapes from a few posters.
this is the wayI'm putting the blame squarely on our younger posters' shoulders.
I don’t know what you are responding to. I know Wake didn’t get worse overnight just because the USN&R ratings metrics changed.The school hasn’t gotten worse, USNews just changed the way they calculated the score, giving more weight to things that benefited big state school.
We should start our own rankings.
Look at who benefits from the new methodology. USNews didn’t just come out of nowhere and say we have been doing it wrong for all these years, let’s give more points to big state run research institutions.I don’t know what you are responding to. I know Wake didn’t get worse overnight just because the USN&R ratings metrics changed.
? I saw who benefits, and again this just sounds like conspiratorial sour grapes on your part. USN&R publishes their metrics every year, and discusses the criticism of them. Why should the metrics never change after 20-something years, when the entire value concept of a college degree has changed drastically in that time?Look at who benefits from the new methodology. USNews didn’t just come out of nowhere and say we have been doing it wrong for all these years, let’s give more points to big state run research institutions.
Or if he supports the ordination of women.Now that the sports board crusader/victim guy has outed himself as a clergyman and said to let us know if we need any services would it just be cruel to pile on by asking if he’d perform a gay marriage?
Because BIG MAGAZINE!I’m not really following the logic of how a random group of universities “paid” for these changes. Seems more like sour grapes from a few posters.
You saw that this is a major overall of the system?? I saw who benefits, and again this just sounds like conspiratorial sour grapes on your part. USN&R publishes their metrics every year, and discusses the criticism of them. Why should the metrics never change after 20-something years, when the entire value concept of a college degree has changed drastically in that time?
njdeac was def #nosathow many #nosat posters are there
Why do you think a school that is “harder to get into” is automatically better? Exclusivity on its own isn’t a value, it’s just a state of being. The debate would be easier to follow if we just discussed the metrics that changed this year.You saw that this is a major overall of the system?
University of Illinois with a 45% acceptance rate and an SAT average of 1340-1530 is #35 while Wake with a 20% acceptance rate and a range of 1380-1510 is 47. So wake is harder to get into but considered a worse school?
Look man, I have no dog in this fight, I didn’t go to Wake undergrad but no one is telling their kid, don’t worry about Wake honey, you got into Maryland, it’s a better school.
Edit: Rutgers would have been a better example.
Why do you think a school that is “harder to get into” is automatically better? Exclusivity on its own isn’t a value, it’s just a state of being. The debate would be easier to follow if we just discussed the metrics that changed this year.
Kory47how many #nosat posters are there