Baseball America has scouting reports for teams from anonymous coaches. They have all been really good of course until you get to Wake. Wasn't it the GT pitcher who muttered something about a Wiffle Ball park to somebody on this board?
Also, our fielding percentage is 34th nationally, and he talks about how bad we are defensively. Again, we gave GT a game this year with a couple of late defensive miscues.
And if our park is that hitter friendly, then wouldn't that mean our pitching is really good to have an era just over 4.00 playing more than half of our games here.
Terrible scouting report.
"There’s a drastic difference on the road. These guys can hit—I’m not taking that away. But as a little bit of an example, when you look at ballpark factors, we found that (Wake’s ballpark) has a park factor of 150. That means it has 50 percent more offense than the average (Division I park). Florida, for example, is basically about 100. So every stat is inflated by about 50 percent. You’re still talking about a team that can hit, but then you factor that in . . .
“The park is so small . . . and they recruit guys who can hit. They’re not very good defensively, but they’re built for that ballpark. It’s the opposite of the 1980s Cardinals who had Willie McGee and Vince Coleman who could all fly and the turf was so fast. They’ve done the opposite of that. I don’t blame them; that’s what I would do, too.”
“It’s a hard place to win because of academics. But they play wiffle ball in a wiffle ball park and they’ve recruited right to it. But I wouldn’t want to pitch there.”
“Still, good pitching beats good hitting. It’s hard to factor the difference between a team like Florida, which is supposed to go to Omaha (and Wake). Maybe they play tight, or maybe they play loose because they think, ‘Hey nobody expected us here.'”
Read more at
http://www.baseballamerica.com/coll...view-wake-forest-florida/#ya6AL6queTIs4mMM.99