Point being tossed around on the Louisville boards right now is that we are just as guilty in this whole thing because we found gameplans laying around and didn't notify anyone. Not sure how they don't see the distinction, even if it was their whole playbook laying around vs. only specific plays, between someone leaving information lying around vs. an insider providing that information directly to a coaching staff.
Scooter, what is your problem? We know Galloway took info. We know Elrod gave it. If they were moral corrupt enough to give/receive a month ago, they were likely capable of receiving info while at Wake.
You act like something so simple is convoluted.
I'm just trying to figure out how deep this goes and account for all angles. I hope our athletic department is doing the same.
It just makes no sense that you would bend over backwards like this to try to say that Wake (through Elrod when he was a coach) might have cheated as well. I already said that Elrod has shown the lack of moral backbone to indicate that he could have received info it it were available. The problem is that, other than Elrod's actions themselves, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that this has ever happened before. Ever. And college football has been around for a long time.
In order for Elrod to have received info when he was a coach, someone would have had to provide it. Who would that have been? Coaches at other schools would not be so motivated - it would hurt their own team and therefore themselves. Someone in media elsewhere, like Elrod? I guess, theoretically, but, again, it has never happened before. Why stretch so far to try and speculate? I don't see what is driving you to go that direction. And I don't think anyone else does either.
Who said we found their playbook? Clawson said we found cards with our plays on them.
Also, we did notify them correct? It was in the news a couple days after the game.
I always though the statement from Louisville's AD that "well, they didn't run any of those plays anyway" was incredibly stupid and out-of-touch. Clawson provided great context for that today.
Not certain if/when we notified them or if it just came out publicly. Either way, assuming that it was after the game and not before it, but I don't think that we found a playbook lying around and used it all to our advantage.
Probably just trying to explain why we were beating them for most of the game.
Too much attention to this but you're misrepresenting your position. My spelling, per your link, is clearly the commonly accepted spelling which you've called into question. Please stop being obtuse. To what purpose?
It just makes no sense that you would bend over backwards like this to try to say that Wake (through Elrod when he was a coach) might have cheated as well. I already said that Elrod has shown the lack of moral backbone to indicate that he could have received info it it were available. The problem is that, other than Elrod's actions themselves, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that this has ever happened before. Ever. And college football has been around for a long time.
In order for Elrod to have received info when he was a coach, someone would have had to provide it. Who would that have been? Coaches at other schools would not be so motivated - it would hurt their own team and therefore themselves. Someone in media elsewhere, like Elrod? I guess, theoretically, but, again, it has never happened before. Why stretch so far to try and speculate? I don't see what is driving you to go that direction. And I don't think anyone else does either.
Wake is States rival? Huh
Point being tossed around on the Louisville boards right now is that we are just as guilty in this whole thing because we found gameplans laying around and didn't notify anyone. Not sure how they don't see the distinction, even if it was their whole playbook laying around vs. only specific plays, between someone leaving information lying around vs. an insider providing that information directly to a coaching staff.
For any Louisville grads who are reading this thread....
If I'm an assistant coach in this situation, I tell my head coach and that's it. The decision to "blow the whistle" is up to him.As a practical matter, if you are an assistant coach and you receive information that you do not want to use for ethical reasons, would you prefer, for purposes of your continued and/or future employment, to (1) blow the whistle immediately or (2) not say anything about it and defend your actions once the breach comes to light?
Point being tossed around on the Louisville boards right now is that we are just as guilty in this whole thing because we found gameplans laying around and didn't notify anyone. Not sure how they don't see the distinction, even if it was their whole playbook laying around vs. only specific plays, between someone leaving information lying around vs. an insider providing that information directly to a coaching staff.
Why do you give a shit what Ph speculates on a message board?
Why do you give a shit about what scooter84 gives a shit about?
And then she told two friends.....Why do you give a shit, about what scooter gives a shit about, what Ph gives a shit about?