That team was 1-11 in the ACC on February 19th....after it blew a 9-point 2nd half lead and lost by 11 at home to Carolina. Let me repeat that: 1-11 in the ACC. With not one, but two All-ACC players. And it did not win a single non-conference game against a team that was ranked in the Top 25. Not a single game.
You are entitled to your opinion about this, but in my opinion, a team that is 1-11 in its conference...with two all-conference players...and who doesn't have a single non-conference win against a ranked team does not deserve a post-season bid. In such a situation, I don't give a flying fuck what its RPI might be. And if it is offered a bid after underperforming so woefully like that, the school should have the decency to turn it down and let some other more deserving team take it. Teams with a 1-11 conference record should not be rewarded with a post-season bid after jacking off all year like that sorry team did.
(It's hard for me to understand how a team that was ranked #1 in the nation and was returning two previous all-conference players, as well as two more guys who played significant minutes like Strickland & Ellis, could go from 13-3 in the conference to 3-13 in the conference in one year. Good, solid programs don't go from 13-3 to 3-13 from one year to the next. Good programs lose good players all the time...but they don't go 13-3 one year, then 3-13 the next year.)