JuiceCrewAllStar
Whole Milk Drinker
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 37,431
- Reaction score
- 10,205
here take my vibe!
I didn't say he's a superior offensive player, I said there's plenty to criticize him for and that him making layups and dunks at a high level isn't one of them. His efficiency and usage numbers speak for themselves pretty clearly here IMO as to what's going on: highly efficient in very low usageAgreed, but most players at least attempt to do something other than score on open lobs. He's elite at that, but extrapolating that into him being a superior offensive player is silly
Yep. If they improve and they're good enough, they'll get their minutes. If they're not good enough, they won't, and it'll be a good thing we added depth. But we're talking about two guys who combined to average about 8p/6r/1a/0.3b in ~29 mpg last year.marsh is fine and keller is fine
getting another big in the portal is not a knock on those guys. even if one of them turned into tim duncan, our highest priority would still be getting one more frontcourt player for depth.
I'd be curious to know how many shots Marsh attempted that were not dunks. I don't remember many.Offensive rating can be a massively skewed stat over small sample sizes and particularly for post players. Despite playing a full year, it's a small sample size for Marsh. He didn't even attempt enough FGs for his FG% to count in the record books as a valid FG%.
He's got a good base set and seems to be fundamentally sound. We can build on that for sure. Seems to have the talent level as well. This is an excellent getreading through some Gonzaga boards, and sounds like they all generally like Sallis
if he can improve his jumper, he could be another all-acc level player for us out of the portal
I’m excited to see how Sallis can develop here, but it seems like a lot of posters are responding as if we just landed a 5* Freshman, when Sallis is an incoming Junior with 300 career points. Has something at Gonzaga prevented him from reaching his potential so far?reading through some Gonzaga boards, and sounds like they all generally like Sallis
if he can improve his jumper, he could be another all-acc level player for us out of the portal
I think he wast just behind Rasir Bolton (who had more experience in the system) and Hickman (who was another 5 star recruit)I’m excited to see how Sallis can develop here, but it seems like a lot of posters are responding as if we just landed a 5* Freshman, when Sallis is an incoming Junior with 300 career points. Has something at Gonzaga prevented him from reaching his potential so far?
less time with coach forbes in spokaneHas something at Gonzaga prevented him from reaching his potential so far?
Alondes Williams only had 347 points at Oklahoma and was only a 3* recruit for OU.I’m excited to see how Sallis can develop here, but it seems like a lot of posters are responding as if we just landed a 5* Freshman, when Sallis is an incoming Junior with 300 career points. Has something at Gonzaga prevented him from reaching his potential so far?
Thanks, Pilch. I am still optimistic Marsh is going to continue to develop and be solid. It is telling that Forbes was looking for help in the post if he could get it but also seems to be willing to spend the last 'ship on a BPA/guard.There are over 3,000 D1 college basketball players. Matthew Marsh was #1 in the nation in 2 PT FG% and in O rating. To claim he didn't improve last season is asinine.
He's 7-1 250, can run and can jump. Yes, his basketball instincts are lacking, and his defense was poor, but this isn't Davion Bradford, Marsh has skills that the staff can work with. You can hate on Marsh all day long, but he will play a role in 2024.