Fayettenam
VILLEMATIC
- Joined
- May 6, 2012
- Messages
- 5,895
- Reaction score
- 498
Bradberry going with number 24... :naughty: New swagger in town.
http://www.panthers.com/news/articl...ted-gold/9f65ab7b-6b4c-4155-bde5-40efe1c44445
Panthers director of college scouting talks about all the UFAs. No question about where Cash will play:
"He's a linebacker. We got him to be a linebacker," Gregory said. "He's 205, has been as heavy as 215, 220. He's got a frame to get bigger. We see him as an outside linebacker. His production translates to outside linebacker for us.
"He's aggressive, a very good tackler. He's smart and has cover skills. He fits into the mold of a poor man's Shaq Thompson. Now we have two of them."
Referring to a first year player as a "poor man's" version of a second year player seems strange.
Referring to a first year player as a "poor man's" version of a second year player seems strange.
I get that, still seems strange to talk about your own players like that. I would just leave it at "he fits the mold of Shaq Thompson".
He's objectively more affordable. Their contract numbers are public. He literally is a poor man's Shaq Thompson.
Interesting pre-draft article comparing CBs in this class.
http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2016...or-athlete-sparq-cornerbacks-in-the-nfl-draft
Got the link from this CSR article:
http://www.catscratchreader.com/201...rs-panthers-2016-draft-class-ranked-dead-last
Bradberry had the fourth highest SPARQ rating in the "Elite NFL athlete" category. He didn't have great production but that's probably because Samford opponents didn't throw to the NFL prospect.
Stat | Points |
Tackle | 1 |
Tackle For Loss | 3 |
QB Hurries | 3 |
Pass Breakup | 3 |
Sack | 6 |
Forced Fumble | 6 |
Interception | 9 |
Read further into that article and it goes on to graph athletic ability vs production, and all 3 of our CBs are either productive but not as athletic (Worley & Sanchez) or athletic but under-performed (Bradberry). A little disconcerting, but still points to potential.