Actually, those two points are related. 1st place in that tournament was roughly a million dollars. As Mahan was leading by two shots after 36-holes, he had a reasonably good chance to win that million dollars. By withdrawing, he was basically flaunting his wealth by saying "I don't need this million dollars. I'm splitting." And that's OK, I suppose. A person has a right to flaunt his wealth if that's what he wants to do. However, it had to be one or the other: either Mahan needed the million dollars or he didn't need the million dollars. If he did need it, he should have stayed there and finished the tournament....and if he didn't need the money, considering the situation and his stated position that he was going to be with his wife at childbirth...he should never have entered the tournament in the first place, because, obviously, there was a chance that the child could be born during that tournament. A 100% chance, as it turned out. And if Mahan didn't need the money and wanted to be with his wife at childbirth, another player who did need the money would have had a chance to play for it.
And once again, none of this has anything to do with what kind of family men that Jack Nicklaus & Tiger Woods are.....which was part of my original post on this thread.
Also, in the other part of my post which referred to the golf records of Tiger & Jack, I mentioned the very relevant fact that Nicklaus has 45 top-3 finishes in the majors, while Tiger only has 24 top-3 finishes in majors. In 55 posts since then, not one person has even commented on that fact. They've been busy talking about Bob Knight & Hunter Mahan.