So an assistant coach is suspended for an exhibition game. The hammer comes down hard.
This. Give a kid and extra meal, and there are sanctions. Create false classes and nothing. The NCAA has a short window to clean up its mess.
So an assistant coach is suspended for an exhibition game. The hammer comes down hard.
There's no nepotism here dumbass. Go back to you bunker.
Those of you claiming this, I don't find it credible given the jobs he was given.
You don't find it credible that he wasn't related to anyone in AD?
Institutional tickets don't pay 2/20 these days. Fixed income investments run around 40 bps and long only mutual fund fees are probably around 70-80 bps. Alternatives may be 1.25% and 15% performance but thats not likely since the ticket sizes would command a fee deal. Now, slap on the fees that Verger makes after making the investments and your looking at best a 1% fixed fee on the AUM for Verger. I'm in the business but what do I know....
NOUN
the practice among those with power or influence of favoring relatives or friends, especially by giving them jobs.
synonyms: favoritism · preferential treatment · the old boy network ·
The anti-Louisville response
I'm still waiting for phdeac's long list of failed crony hires who are less virtuous than their MAC alternatives.
How can they suspend Galloway without suspending other members of the coaching staff? Yes, he was the entry point into the program. But clearly he didn’t get the information and keep it to himself. And anyone on the team having knowledge of the information, is just as guilty as he is. You could argue Petrino didn’t know (which I don’t believe), but based on everything we've heard there’s no way Galloway was the only member of the coaching staff that knew.
One former assistant didn't get back to IU. I know Knorr is involved. Especially after giving up 600 yards of offense 2/3 games leading up to ours.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Haven't looked at what all Ph has said, so there might be a lot I disagree with, but I suspect he's right about nepotism being a problem to an extent. I don't like the idea of any department being run as one person's little fiefdom. I want to see the best, most qualified people hired at all times. I'm a bit surprised so many are taking issue with that.
While this is a better statement from Jurich than the first one, the part about Petrino not knowing seems weak. Even Jurich noted that WF did not use the plays in the game. Clearly they had specific plays they were looking for, but they never happened. Will never believe Petrino did not know. Guys like him know everything going on with their program.
Nepotism is family
Cronyism is friends
Let's move on