DeacLaw05
Well-known member
There may be games on the schedule every year that I want to win more than the State game, but somehow few wins are ever more enjoyable than beating them.
Wolford is footballs version of Josh Howard. As a soph many in our fan base did not support them. By their senior year pretty universally loved and playing like 4 year seniors should.
Not really. A failed challenge would’ve cost us a time-out we may have needed if State had scored and gone up 1 and we would’ve had to try to get in FG range. Spot challenges aren’t often overturned unless really egregious. I thought the same thing when it happened, but when I thought about it after the game I understood his thinking there.
There may be games on the schedule every year that I want to win more than the State game, but somehow few wins are ever more enjoyable than beating them.
Timeouts aren’t that important with clock stopping on first downs. 2 would have been plenty. Plus we’d have only needed a FG. Game is all but over when you win challenge.
Clawson coaches to avoid worst case scenarios. And maybe that’s good or important. But I’d like to see us put it on the line a little more.
From being at the game, one thing that I noticed is that we tackled very well in space. We didn't give up any big plays due to missed tackling
Great observation. Noticed this too.
And also our coverage was softish. Except for the Stop and go route we got burned on, we made State take ~5 yards all the way down the field to score. Avoided big plays. Kept ball in front of us and tackled well. Felt like their bigger “chunk” plays came when we blitzed and couldn’t get to QB. Duke was missed a lot. State was patient and took what we gave them.
I agree except it’s nice to have that extra timeout if you think you’re going to need it to ball the center for your kicker and get the FG unit out on the field, which would’ve been the situation had State gone up 1.
Well, except Josh wasn't faced with the prospect of not seeing the court during his senior year. Wolford was beat up, much maligned, and designated to the backup role and yet he kept playing and proved himself and went on to have a historic season. I don't think I've ever seen anything quite like it.
Yeah I mean if he would’ve challenged I don’t think it would’ve been wrong to do, but I can also understand why he didn’t. I just don’t see a lot of spot challenges overturned. Be a good question for the radio show this week.
John Wolford should be in the room when they present the Heisman award to Baker Mayfield.
3rd and 5.
Punting against decent breeze. With inconsistent punter
You don’t have your best Dlineman or DB on Defense
Your QB is poised enough to know if no one is open, tuck it and run.
You play to win the game. Not to hope you don’t lose.
I don’t care where we put ball. I’d have hated to rely on Weaver there. I’m pretty sure that extra point was on him too. And 2 or 3 timeouts, would have been tough to go length of field in short time on them. Think their defense was still tough even though we had some success.
I think best chance to win game was challenge spot. And then throw to get a first down or 2.
John Wolford should be in the room when they present the Heisman award to Baker Mayfield.
Rs freshman is LG on kicks.