RChildress107
Well-known member
Twice I’ve quoted you saying two different things in the same post.
If you stopped defending Manning, people would stop saying you’re defending Manning.
I know expressing two different yet not contradictory ideas at once seems complicated but it’s really not.
See here’s how it works. Wake had a really bad season last year, thanks to a shit job by our coach, where we didn’t even crack the top 80. Given our talent a lot of coaches could have done better.
That means they could have cracked the top 80. Still with me?
Most of those coaches though would have had us, again based on our talent, in between #40 and # 80.
Only a handful (that’s five for most people) would have gotten us into the top 36.
I chose that number because 36/4 = 9 ( that’s called math) and you said last year’s team with John Collins would have been a 9 or 10 seed ( there are 4 of each seed in the NCAA tournament, again math)
So, if you are still with me, you will see that my post said two complimentary, not contradictory, things, pointing towards one conclusion: losing John Collins ( what some would refer to as talent) had a larger impact on last season than Manning being a shitty “coach”