It's really unfortunate that you think that. My organizing is the antithesis of Trump. Anytime someone disagrees with you, you whine as if it is some personal attack against you. If you spent 1/10 of the time you spend arguing with me trying to understand DSA positions, you may be able to decide on your own if you want to be an ally. I still hope you do that. If you judged every political party/movement by an asshole online, you'd have no political affiliation.
To-date, I don't feel you have articulated any disagreements you have with DSA, so I have no idea where you fall on important issues. Without any substantive debate, I'm left to think you are not a potential ally. Just a liberal with no real interest in questioning the status quo of the Democratic Party. Put another way, I don't think I drive you away as an ally. I don't think you agree with any of the DSA platform. So you constantly conflate a debate over simply defining what that platform is, with accusation that I am telling people they have to accept 100% of my positions.
You also conflate the idea that people should vote Democrat, with the idea that you have the right to take away someone's agency and tell them they have to vote Democrat. The way to change the world is not solely through electoral politics. Given how much you like to brag about your past organizing work, you should understand that. The Democratic Party won't save us. The sooner we understand that the better. If you want to vote for Democrats in the meantime, it doesn't matter to me.
At this point in history, a vote for a third/fourth party from the the left is absolutely a vote for the Republicans. It may not be that way in 20-30 years, but today that is the reality.
By voting against Dems in the Senate and presidential elections, you will be de facto voting to replace RBG and Breyer with people to the right of Gorsuch. This will turn back nearly everything that has been gained over the past fifty years for the next fifty years. What we need will be dead for the rest of your life by throwing away your votes over the next 2-3 years.
RE: Not agreeing with DSA platform - that's a perfect example of what I've said- that if we don't agree 100% in your mind we don't agree at all. Let's look at some of the DSA's points:
Labor:
For over a quarter of a century on Wake boards, I have posted support for strong and expanded unions. I've argued with dozens of people that just having unions in every state strengthens earnings of even non-union workers. I've stated hundreds of times that union wages and benefits are critical for even non-union workers.
I've worked for living wage laws when you were in elementary school and for raising the minimum wage for decades. On these boards, I've shown RWers that it's a lie to say raising the minimum wage costs jobs when studies show that employment increases when that happens.
I've stated numerous times that CEOS are grossly overpaid and senior management is actually counter-productive to profitability. It should be given to the workers as this would increase their buying power and lives.
All of this and more aren't enough for you.
Money in politics:
Again, for my entire adult life, I've supported exclusively public financing of elections with no use of personal funds. I've said we should have much shorter election cycles. I was the loudest voice on these boards against Citizens United. Money isn't free speech. It never has been and never will be.
But this isn't enough for you.
Internationalism:
Again, I've been the board's stalwart in saying every day, borders become less meaningful. We should be helping third and fourth world countries for moral, political and economic reasons.
Those are just a few of the ways that I "don't agree with any of the DSA platform". Your blind ego and butthurt keeps you from seeing the very obvious.
As a fun aside, the uber-Trumpy Bobknightfan used to believe that no CEO should be paid over $1,000,000/year.