DeaconSig
Well-known member
I love RJ's marketing strategies for political campaigns.
Dems could nominate John Kasich and the Republicans would spend hundreds of millions painting him as a socialist who wants to destroy Medicare and raise taxes.
Trump's debate strategy against Warren would be just to reply "Whatever you say, Pocahontas" while doing the jerkoff motion
Regardless of how true that may or may not be, a ubiquitous set of advertising it for several months would re-elect Trump.
This is true. However, when it's true about Bernie or Warren it will get legs.
I'm sincerely interested to see if 4 years is enough time for the Dems to learn how to debate Trump. Surely someone can figure out you fight fire with fire. If he pulls a "sleepy joe" comment, the response is "yeah, let's hear from cadet bone spurs on this issue." Call him out, to his face, for paying off porn stars and claiming to represent family values. There are literally hundreds of these responses. That twitter thread (the author's name escapes me) on how they defeated a white supremacist in Louisiana was spot on. This doesn't need to be a policy debate. It needs to be a good v. evil debate.
As usual, MHB gives nothing of substance.
If you don't believe that the GOP could turn people out on the college debt forgiveness issue, you are living in a dream world. How much more exacting of an "us vs. them" could you hand Trump than having his supporters be taxed to pay off the college debts of people who are already making more money (on average) than they are? Talk about an easy resentment issue, this is it.
I'm sincerely interested to see if 4 years is enough time for the Dems to learn how to debate Trump. Surely someone can figure out you fight fire with fire. If he pulls a "sleepy joe" comment, the response is "yeah, let's hear from cadet bone spurs on this issue." Call him out, to his face, for paying off porn stars and claiming to represent family values. There are literally hundreds of these responses. That twitter thread (the author's name escapes me) on how they defeated a white supremacist in Louisiana was spot on. This doesn't need to be a policy debate. It needs to be a good v. evil debate.
As I said before, feelings aren't evidence.
RJ are you going to vote for Delaney?
I'm sincerely interested to see if 4 years is enough time for the Dems to learn how to debate Trump. Surely someone can figure out you fight fire with fire. If he pulls a "sleepy joe" comment, the response is "yeah, let's hear from cadet bone spurs on this issue." Call him out, to his face, for paying off porn stars and claiming to represent family values. There are literally hundreds of these responses. That twitter thread (the author's name escapes me) on how they defeated a white supremacist in Louisiana was spot on. This doesn't need to be a policy debate. It needs to be a good v. evil debate.
maybe your arguments are just trash.
Pete is doing that. I can’t believe I haven’t seen more glowing write-ups about him looking right at the camera and telling Republicans that they’ll be remembered by how they supported Trump. That was a big moment in the debate.