Strickland33
Well-known member
Seriously, RJ and ChrisL - y’all should take a few hours off. Please.
I disagree. I've seen no reasonable rejection of her story. people just keep repeating that it took her so long to come out with it and it's changed, both of which regularly happen with rape victims. Dismissing her story on those grounds is not reasonable, but I hope some one can come up with something. If you've got other, reasonab;e grounds to question her credibility, please share (if you already have, my bad, I've been only skimming the boards for a couple weeks for various reasons).
Now do an equally thorough summary of Biden’s lies and flaws.
Also celebrated as the "Lion of Senate" and mounted a primary challenge against a sitting Dem president less than 12 years after Chappaquiddick.
But to be fair, personal responsibility has never been a popular plank in the Dem platform.
Biden isn't accusing her of sexually assaulting him.
Catamount, why did you delete your post?
If you're such a fucking stalwart for 100% accuracy and honest, you should probably sit out this election.
because i decided this isn't worth getting involved in. y'all got it.
So has she made millions from her accusation?
If you're such a fucking stalwart for 100% accuracy and honest, you should probably sit out this election.
It's not all like Cosby. First of all, there were dozens of accusations that never saw the light of day about Cosby and Weinstein. After coming forward, Cosby's (and Trump's) accusers kept their stories straight. They didn't change every time they were interviewed.
I'm not talking about misrembering something from a month ago or twenty years ago. Reade planned dropping her story. She knew she'd be asked questions. Each time she was asked, she changed something. She orchestrated her own story and couldn't keep it straight.
There's another drastic difference. Cosby, Trump, Weinstein, Nasser and the coach at Ohio State sexually assaulted dozens of people. The same is usually the pattern for priests and other people in positions of power. Reade is the only person who has ever said Biden sexually assaulted her.
As I have said many times, I think she has hurt many survivors.
Link?
There has been a mountain of reasonable rejection of her story.
5. Her backstory has shown a person who is willing to lie and manipulate to get what she wants.
6. There is evidence that her pay was docked twice for poor performance and one of the few biden employees who remember her indicated that she was fired for performance.
7. She was additionally charged with check fraud 4 days before her termination.
I can go on.
I think this lady has many issues, which along with the inconsistencies, was why responsible journalists weren't touching this story with a 10 foot pole. The far left media ran with it and now her dirty laundry has been aired to the nation when it never should have been.
There has been a mountain of reasonable rejection of her story. It's why nobody but a small sliver of the loco left is even paying this story any attention.
1. She claimed that she told multiple people about this over several years after it happened. So are we to buy that she subsequently repressed it during her Biden is a swell guy phase, or that she changed it to non-sexual touching during her Putin is a swell guy phase or now to sexual assault during her hard core Bernie supporter phase.
2. She isn't claiming that this is a repressed memory. She has even tried to rationalize why she behaved that way in the past while claiming that she had full knowledge that Biden sexually assaulted her.
3. She telegraphed that fact that this was a political hit job on twitter.
4. Pretty much all of the details of her story are suspect once investigated, and she changes her story when new information is uncovered which makes her prior claims not believable.
5. Her backstory has shown a person who is willing to lie and manipulate to get what she wants.
6. There is evidence that her pay was docked twice for poor performance and one of the few biden employees who remember her indicated that she was fired for performance.
7. She was additionally charged with check fraud 4 days before her termination.
I can go on.
I think this lady has many issues, which along with the inconsistencies, was why responsible journalists weren't touching this story with a 10 foot pole. The far left media ran with it and now her dirty laundry has been aired to the nation when it never should have been.
1. Not a legitimate reason to dismiss her story without investigation.
2. Not a legitimate reason to dismiss her story without investigation.
3. Link?
4. Link?
5. Link?
6. How is this related?
7. Corroborating evidence of unrelated thing?
Thanks for trying. If there is actual evidence of 3,4, and 5 please share. 6 and 7, I guess show she's had some problems in the past, but why are they related?