• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Official Election Month Thread: COUP falls short, nothing to see here

I don't think the Republican fractures are that deep. The few Republicans that speak out with conviction are quickly purged.
 
Junebug...is this normal?!?

Depends on what you mean by normal.

House Dems objected to Florida’s slate of electors in W’s victory in 2001, Ohio’s slate in W’s victory in 2005, and, as I understand it, several states’ slates in Trump’s victory in 2017. In 2005, Barbara Boxer joined the objection in the Senate, which required the objection be voted on by the full Congress. In the vote, 31 house Dems voted to reject Ohio’s electors, as did Boxer.

So, yes, there is recent precedent for challenging election results in Congress. In fact, house Dems objected in all 3 of the Pubs’ most recent election wins, and one such challenged required a vote. The challenge that is coming tomorrow is different in degree, in that many more congresspeople will join in, but similar in kind.

And for the record, I think all of the challenges I’ve discussed—including the one that will come tomorrow—were (are) flawed, irresponsible, anti-democratic, harmful to the institutions of Congress and the Presidency, and, likely, unconstitutional.
 
How many Ds objected and was it because they didn’t believe the results of the election and hoped to overturn it?
 
Pubs know this isn’t going anywhere either. Dems control the House. It’s a stunt with no upside, which is why Mitch wanted to shut it down.
 
Pubs know this isn’t going anywhere either. Dems control the House. It’s a stunt with no upside, which is why Mitch wanted to shut it down.

but the point is if the Rs controlled the House then they could get somewhere with it when they have no proper claims for voter fraud
 
but the point is if the Rs controlled the House then they could get somewhere with it when they have no proper claims for voter fraud

Exactly. If Pubs control both houses of Congress after 2022, the 2024 election doesn't really matter. Republicans who lose their seats will claim fraud and they'll refuse to seat Dems who win. Then they'll name Trump president.

Junebug, you've underestimated Republican corruption every step of the way. The Republican base earnestly believes Trump will remain President because of fraud that wasn't even presented in court. This is your party. These are your people. They're trying to subvert democracy. You know this. Don't downplay it.
 
I don't think the Republican fractures are that deep. The few Republicans that speak out with conviction are quickly purged.

Pub blue state governors and senators like Romney, Sasse and Murkowski have not been purged. And it's not like Trump treats mostly compliant governors like Kemp and DeSantis any better than the Hogans, Bakers and Dewines of the world. I've seen a few different articles just today talking about those fractures, 1 from The Hill. I think Sasse is correct that GOP DC pols are mostly just doing what they can to humor Trump and his supporters before the GA runoff and the inauguration and hoping against hope that he goes quietly or loudly into the night on 1/20. And I don't think any of us really know what the new reality will be and how beholden DC pols are to Trump come 1/21.
 
Republican State Senate Majority in Pennsylvania refusing to swear in a Democratic Senator - certified winner, because the Republican candidate who lost refuses to concede.
 
but the point is if the Rs controlled the House then they could get somewhere with it when they have no proper claims for voter fraud

I disagree. I think there are enough pub congresspeople who are uneasy enough with this as it is—a stunt—that they wouldn’t go along if there were an actual chance that it could overturn the election. There are some pubs who are true believers, to be sure, but the vast majority of pubs don’t actually want Trump to retain the White House if it means there will literally be blood in the streets.

In any event, we won’t get to find out, because neither the house nor the senate is going to vote to overturn the election.
 
Republican State Senate Majority in Pennsylvania refusing to swear in a Democratic Senator - certified winner, because the Republican candidate who lost refuses to concede.

god this is so fucked up.Trump's party has opened the floodgates now. There are going to be shenanigans like this all over the fucking country.
 
Republican State Senate Majority in Pennsylvania refusing to swear in a Democratic Senator - certified winner, because the Republican candidate who lost refuses to concede.

Ridiculous petty stunt by that Demo-RAT trying to get sworn in before the Republican concedes. What happened to norms ?!?
 
I disagree. I think there are enough pub congresspeople who are uneasy enough with this as it is—a stunt—that they wouldn’t go along if there were an actual chance that it could overturn the election. There are some pubs who are true believers, to be sure, but the vast majority of pubs don’t actually want Trump to retain the White House if it means there will literally be blood in the streets.

In any event, we won’t get to find out, because neither the house nor the senate is going to vote to overturn the election.

*this year
 
what is it with board Rs (except Pops who FINALLY saw the light a couple of days ago) who think that their old party still exists and that they will do the right thing when given the chance? Trump has changed your party forever.
 
what is it with board Rs (except Pops who FINALLY saw the light a couple of days ago) who think that their old party still exists and that they will do the right thing when given the chance? Trump has changed your party forever.

Trump did not change the party. Trump was the logical next step for where the party had been headed for the last 30+ years
 
Pub blue state governors and senators like Romney, Sasse and Murkowski have not been purged. And it's not like Trump treats mostly compliant governors like Kemp and DeSantis any better than the Hogans, Bakers and Dewines of the world. I've seen a few different articles just today talking about those fractures, 1 from The Hill. I think Sasse is correct that GOP DC pols are mostly just doing what they can to humor Trump and his supporters before the GA runoff and the inauguration and hoping against hope that he goes quietly or loudly into the night on 1/20. And I don't think any of us really know what the new reality will be and how beholden DC pols are to Trump come 1/21.

Murkowski and Romney weren't on the ballot. Nebraska is hardly a blue state. Collins' criticism has not gone beyond "concern."

I don't buy that they are just spineless to say anything until after 1/21. This is who they are.
 
what is it with board Rs (except Pops who FINALLY saw the light a couple of days ago) who think that their old party still exists and that they will do the right thing when given the chance? Trump has changed your party forever.

If I didn’t disagree with you, I would have left the party a long time ago.
 
Trump did not change the party. Trump was the logical next step for where the party had been headed for the last 30+ years

If I didn’t disagree with you, I would have left the party a long time ago.
 
If I didn’t disagree with you, I would have left the party a long time ago.

it all started when they put Palin on the ticket...you had time and ample reason to leave like the rest of us.
 
Back
Top