Your last paragraph falls outside the scope of what ATS and I are focusing on.
We're both looking at the next year or two. There are absolutely supply chain problems, but that doesn't mean that you can't have a co-mingled problem.
You can exert pressure from both sides of the market. A 2x4 costs ~$0.25/ft. in "normal" conditions. If you add a pandemic, which removes the vast majority of supply of 2x4's, the price jumps to ~$1.00/ft. Then you give everyone in the Country $2,000 and they want to build a deck. Well, now that motherfucker is ~$2.00/ft and oh my fucking god, the weekend warrior is now seriously impacting the ability for large-scale contractors to effectively build housing.
and principally this isn't just wood but lots of things outside of building houses. i totally get how the supply chain issues combined with more purchasing power creates a supply and demand bottleneck. however, what % of the people getting 1400 want to now buy something affected by these concerns vs people who will pay bills or debt or put it in savings or whatever? seems like the targeting is just about right in that someone like me isn't getting the $, and my wife does want to re-do our bathroom (goddammit).
It's happening in that sector right now, and you have a collision of shit causing a lot of problems. The cheap money typically leads to people buying houses (low interest rates r gud). However, we're straight up running out of houses for peoople to move in to. The GSO area typically has something like 4,000 SFH's on the market at any given time. We're in a world where that's more like 40 at any given time right now. Same thing as the 2x4 - demand is out-stripping supply. But then you've also got the added problem of Rufus - my 60-something buddy who wants to build a house, but won't put his house on the market, because lumber prices are too high to build a new home. So those inflationary bubbles start to merge.
makes sense, the DC market is interesting in that regard too. we've got new housing laws about density and affordability that i'm sure are constrained by these same supply chain concerns as well. totally different thing, i know, but still of interest.
Couple that with my most-often-used HVAC contractor being STRAIGHT FUCKED. All of his best techs have been fired or won't come back from a layoff because they are slaying it in unemployment. So he's dicking around with garbage techs that - I shit you not - have come back over 20 times to the last job they did for me (typically, new SFH should have 4 maybe 5 HVAC visits). Stack on top of that a totally wild problem getting new/replacement HVAC parts that are totally fucking random. Register vents? We have 123124,42,35435463 of them. Motherboards for furnaces? We have negative 234249328 of them and we're backordered so deep in the ass that you'd better consider fucking geothermal.
i'd argue (at least theoretically anyway) that this is precisely the kind of case study we need to be discussing regarding UBI. there are studies in europe about paying people not to work that go well beyond just our paltry unemployment spending. they still tend to conclude that people want to work on the whole, and until i see good large scale data to suggest otherwise, i think these are short term effects of not right-sizing welfare spending. because more jobs are going to go away, and that doesn't have to be a bad thing. our productivity has so far outstripped wage and social spending growth that something has to eventually give.
It's cool to say, "awww...yeah, macro economic policy and shit," but the economy is usually an ocean, but right now it is acting like a fucking four year old in a bathtub sloshing fucking water on the ceiling.