That is a different issue - I am talking about self defense laws and what they say/mean. You are talking about police shootings that they justify as addressing a threat which may or may not have existed. Some of those situations are egregious and certainly there should be consequences - often there are, but sometimes there aren't. Some of those are miscarriages of justice - which are terrible - but I am not talking about those.
My real point is that the Rittenhouse verdict is not a hill you want to die on - the facts and the evidence, at a minimum, create a real doubt as to whether he was reasonable in his belief that he was acting in self defense - and, taken in the light most favorable to the defendant, establish a clear case of self defense.
I just think this is a stupid case to be protesting about. The other examples y'all bring up and that have happened over the past few years are much worse - many are terrible.