• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Let's take a moment to thank Pfizer, Moderna & the academic Elites at WFU: forcing mRNA into young athletes veins "It could have been so much worse"

80, why are you so obsessed with McCullough rather than the entire body of evidence we have? I’ve explained how to access scientific studies and you ignored that. Instead, you are fixated on McCullough rather than the truth. Why is that?
 
Anybody know if Grant Wahl was vaccinated?
 
I love that multiple times 80 has included that XYZ has been shown to occur in connection with "Covid/Covid vaccines." So not like an outright denial that ill effects on organs or myocarditis are due to Covid (like a lot of anti-vaxxers out there) but also that it may be from vaccines as well!
 
I just like that he presents well known common things that he has “researched and discovered”that makes it seem like it’s some great find when any educated person knows that and more importantly he’s talking to a bunch of doctors.
 
Fauci-eb51.gif
 
To make sure I understand, you are saying less than 75 of the 688 articles you found by him are in the "pay' journals, correct? So, over 600 are not in such a category? Can you find out how many, if any, are in a journal such as JAMA?
No. 76 articles are in that one "pay" journal alone. I just looked at his 20 most recent articles in PubMed and 15 are in a variety of "pay" journals [why I am doing this, I have no idea...].

He has 4 articles in JAMA; the most recent is 2008. One is an editorial and he is not the lead author on the other 3. There is a ranking in academics called the H Index, which takes into account number of publications, quality of publications, number of times cited, etc. He is ranked 3042. No shame in any of this at all. The shame is when he incorrectly tries to advertise himself as the most cited cardiologist in the world.
 
No. 76 articles are in that one "pay" journal alone. I just looked at his 20 most recent articles in PubMed and 15 are in a variety of "pay" journals [why I am doing this, I have no idea...].

He has 4 articles in JAMA; the most recent is 2008. One is an editorial and he is not the lead author on the other 3. There is a ranking in academics called the H Index, which takes into account number of publications, quality of publications, number of times cited, etc. He is ranked 3042. No shame in any of this at all. The shame is when he incorrectly tries to advertise himself as the most cited cardiologist in the world.
.
 
Yes, there are many pay-to-publish journals that use peer review. In fact, most do. These journals are called open-access; the pay-to-publish model allows them to be free to the public without a subscription. In theory, this is a great model, and there are some high-quality open-access journals. However, the model has been corrupted, and there are now thousands of these "journals" that make money through people that are willing to pay to have low-quality papers published. I get about 15 spam emails a day (they go directly into my junk mail) from these kinds of journals asking me to submit an article, and this happens to everyone that has published in standard journals.
I wonder if the regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies could be similarly compromised and corrupted?
 
The NY Times also reported on the guilt of the Duke Lacrosse team and many other similar stories. They've also faced lawsuits for such.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org > wiki> List_of_controversies

Such articles always followed anyone who had an alternative view on the virus and how it should best be fought. Strange, none of these people ever had such accusations before COVID, most in their 50-60s with long track records.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top