IAppreciateIt
no bunting allowed
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2011
- Messages
- 14,605
- Reaction score
- 4,623
marsh is solid offensively just as a dunker, but man is it tough to justify playing a big who offers no rim protection.
Agree. Our defense will continue to suffer if we don’t add that element.marsh is solid offensively just as a dunker, but man is it tough to justify playing a big who offers no rim protection.
I mean, the haters have been right. Our team has sucked for almost the entirety of the time that OGboards has been in existence.i feel like all the haters have been hating since i've been on the boards. most of the time, it ends up looking pretty stupid but we have no shame on these here ogboards
yea but we've had some nice players who some folks on here want to run out of town because they didn't hit the ground running as freshmenI mean, the haters have been right. Our team has sucked for almost the entirety of the time that OGboards has been in existence.
I mean, the haters have been right. Our team has sucked for almost the entirety of the time that OGboards has been in existence.
What's wrong about what I said? Do you think he's good on defense? And literally 90% of his points are assisted on.Stick to looking for Devin Booker blowie videos.
My sentiments exactly.If my math is right, currently we have 2 open scholarships given who has officially entered the portal:
Gone: DW, Appleby, Taylor, McCray, Open Scholarship that we already have (5)
In: Clark, MMM, Friedrichsen (3)
Would guess Bradford is the next domino to fall, giving us 3. Not sure if there is one more move after that, but it seems like every year there is a surprise.
Time to get to work in the portal and get some ballers.
1A and 1B are a PG and a center capable of starting (or at least giving 20-25 mins)
After that I think we try to get the best player possible with a preference to a guard who can handle the ball. Obviously if a 4th slot opens up then it frees us up a bit.
Or rebounding.marsh is solid offensively just as a dunker, but man is it tough to justify playing a big who offers no rim protection.
Nothing wrong with optimism, imho he better take a big step forward. To me he looked lost and over-matched, not to mention weak. Sincerely hope you are right.I would be very disappointed. I seem to be higher on Keller than the vast majority of the board. He's got quick hands on defense, can actually shoot, and has great size. Big guys take time to develop. He's going to be an excellent player for us if he stays.
Answered right below that post. Your hyperbole is misplaced.What's wrong about what I said? Do you think he's good on defense? And literally 90% of his points are assisted on.
Averaged 3.5 ppg and 2.75 rpg over the last 4 games. With a limited roster and his competition (Bradford) essentially off the team. I'm sure he'll improve, but I'm not confident it'll be enough.Answered right below that post. Your hyperbole is misplaced.
Yeah, we need a bigboy 5 who can either block shit and board or muscle people up defensively and board. We have enough guys that can shoot the 3 that our C doesn't need to do that. If he has a FT distance jumper, that's awesome.I don’t think we need a stretch 5 at all. If we want to go small ball then we just put Carr in there. We need a big body who blocks shit.
Carr at the 5 can work in stretches, particularly with Klintman at the 4I don’t think we need a stretch 5 at all. If we want to go small ball then we just put Carr in there. We need a big body who blocks shit.