My dude, you are wasting way too much effort changing letters to symbols or numbers.
A PW like "p0$+3RrU8!k5B@t+eRy92" is definitely p secure and by itself would take 3 sextillion years to crack, but also just using something like "poster-rubiks-battery92!" (throwing one special character at the end and a number to satisfy any dumb PW character requirements) would take an order of magnitude more (3 septillion years), all while being about a million times easier to type and remember w/out having to translate to 1337 speak in your head.
Try it yourself!:
https://www.security.org/how-secure-is-my-password/
Ok...wtf...lol....
And the example I gave was just to show a bunch of different changes you could make, my real passwords only have about 4 changes, maybe 5.
But why would one with basic english words take longer? Is it just because mine was 21 characters and the one you have was 24? (BTW, when I tested yours I got 75 sextillion to my 3 sextillion, but neither here nor there) Or is it because there are more letters to try than single digit numbers or symbols? Either way, that is simultaneously awesome, and disappointing.
I had to listen 4 times before I could even understand the words. AI always seems to write in such super-basic words/rhymes (basic as in beginner, not the programming language). Like I asked ChatGPT to write a song about Wake Forest University and it was just sooo stupid. I know that's not it's purpose and that is a silly example, but still it shows how it's still more A than I as someone said here.
I once found the tip of a nitrile glove in a frozen box of pad thai I was eating. Fortunately, it did not have anything inside of it.
I bit into a fried chicken breast sandwich, kinda like the one you'd get at Chick-Fil-A, but not nearly as good, from my HS cafeteria, and it was still wrapped in plastic from the freezer I guess...but literally as soon as I bit into it, the entire breading came off with the plastic....so gross.
I’m afraid that’s what Chalamet will try to channel, and he’ll take it over the top. Wilder had restraint and could use it.
I generally love Chalamet, but he is definitely over acting in the clips I've seen...like here in this clip around the 17 second mark where he says "making chocolate o' course" it just sounds so fake and trying too hard. And he's making the Jim Carrey kinda facial movements. Just too much.
The supporting cast seems pretty great though. I love Keegan-Michael Key in basically EVERYTHING he does, and Hugh Grant as the Oompa Loompa looks hilarious....also Matt Lucas and Rowan Atkinson are plusses.
Seems like with a better lead, this could have been amazing. But they had to jump on the "It" guy...surprised it's not Oscar Isaac or Pedro Pascal lol....I'll wait till streaming, if I even watch it.