Recent content by Deac83

https://syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/226128-remembering-darryl-stingley-the-player-the-hit-the-man.amp.html

Ok, I don't know who IAppreciatelt is, but I also done know what he's talking about my posts. Maybe he's just messing with me but if there is something going on I don't know about let me know.

Uh, ok.

I really don't know what's wrong with Sam. Going to the 4th highest winning percentage program in history, after all, Wake has just moved out of last place, of the P5, by going 8-4 and Indiana going 4-8. What is he thinking? And if you tell me that he'll have a solid offensive line that can...

There is a lot of 'artificial' intelligence on these boards. We'd have delete 75% of the posts.

I’ll go on the record. Hope Sam does well and leads his team to victories except against us. It’s not like he was a 2 year star player and said he was staying only to make the money grab and set back the program for several years. From everything I’ve seen Sam was all in on wake for 5 years...

Such hurt feelings here. Yes would rather not play him next year. I believe there are only 32 teams that are on national TV every week, no matter who they play and they are all in the NFL. I'm not sure what team people would realistically have him going to. A team that will be highly ranked...

Clearly Collins will be hitting 6 3's on Saturday.

There you go. A month ago we were behind Indiana. We have arrived. IIRC many years ago we were ahead of kstate until Snyder got there

9 times in 100 years of playing football? Got it. We also, still, have the worst winning percentage of all power 5 teams. Which just makes essentially blowing a couple of wins just a little worse.

So the answer is that other than the 2012 study the are no other current analysis of this particular decision.

So data is not really that big.

Until this thread, didn't realize that if I type something on my laptop on a thread. Then go to my phone and post something on a diff topic on the thread, this new board will post the stuff that it saved on the laptop even if I never hit post reply. Interesting.

Well we could argue this for a long time. I think, my main point/question is, why are there not stats that say kick on 3rd. It would probably have to take into account that a kicker like Succup is 90%+ inside of 40, but drops down to 77% 40-49.

And FWIW 1-29 yards Succup is 98%, with two misses in his career. 30-39 92% - 9 misses 40-49 77% - 30 misses So a 40 yard kick is somewhere between 92% and 77%. Get the 10 yards to the 29 is a near lock. based on this they should have just kicked in 1st down. If you are afraid of losing...