Recent content by Rafi

It is possible you may have missed some sarcasm in my post.

Exactly. The only thing that matters, and I mean only thing, is if you make the NCAA tournament. That's why our 2017 season with Manning was infinitely better than this past season. In 2017 Wake went 19-14 and finished 10th in the ACC, whereas this year we went 21-14 and finished 5th in the...

The Wake men had the low round of the day. Brennan tied for lowest individual round today and was named co-champion after 5 extra holes. The women earned the ACC team championship after play was suspended because it was too dark. Classic Wake. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Not sure, but you're right that he has been a machine this year.

The ACC championships conclude this weekend. The Wake men made the semifinals and lost a really close match to FSU. Wake was down 0-3 and came back to tie it at 3-3. Wake won 3 third set matches, all of which Wake lost the first set, but Matthew Thompson lost in a third set at 3 singles. FSU...

You may have missed Roach's twitter post, but he basically said "I wish." Indicating that number is not correct.

It's the opposite of when Tim Duncan completed his sophomore and junior years. He would have been the #1 pick in the draft after both seasons, but reporters had to track him down to ask if he was going pro or coming back to Wake, and both times he was like (paraphrasing, obviously) "yeah, of...

Friedrichsen is back. I didn't know he was gone, but good to know he's back.

No, he's going in the portal. Check again what he wrote.

How bad was it? Bz and Manning weren't even close to making the NIT. ACC finishes: Bz 12, 9, 9, 13 and Manning 12, 13, 10, 14, 13, 13. (For comparison, Forbes is 14, 5, 8, 5)

Why did you remove #175? Should we remove #35. Include all the data and draw a line of best fit. That's how you graph a trend.

Maybe it will be a virtual banner? In terms of objective data (not feelings), I'm glad we're trending in the right direction.

This is absolutely correct. The fans and the players view college basketball extremely differently. Fans think about loyalty, consistency, repping your school, etc. Players look at where they can showcase their ability best to make the NBA and where they can get paid the most. I can't blame...

And if you like your stock to skyrocket so you can go to the NBA.

Back then, the ACC was the biggest stage, and Wake was at the top of the league. Maybe Rutland would have gone somewhere else for money, like Georgetown, but Wake likely would have landed a really good player in his place.