The only basis on which UCLA is a better job than Texas is tradition, and UCLA hasn't won a title in 20 years and hasn't been the dominant program in the country in 40 years. Current recruits were not alive when UCLA won in 1995 and many of their parents weren't alive when UCLA was dominant in the 60s and 70s. Texas is equal or better in virtually every respect: resources, facilities, size of fanbase, national exposure, recent success, NBA alums, competition in natural recruiting territory, quality of life for coach, cost of living, conference.