timdunkandthefunk
Rusty Larue
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 17,091
- Reaction score
- 837
SCORCHING hot take from William there.
So the best actor/actress went to actors portraying real people overcoming some sort of debilitating disease and best picture went to a movie about acting.
Chalk.
So the best actor/actress went to actors portraying real people overcoming some sort of debilitating disease and best picture went to a movie about acting.
Chalk.
Hey, at least the Holocaust didn't make an appearance this year
I liked Birdman, but am a little salty because Boyhood really hit the dad chord in me and it was my favorite movie last year. But, ultimately it's the Oscars, so WGAF? It wasn't Crash over Brokeback Mountain.
Serious question: would Boyhood be a great movie without the 12-year filming gimmick? Or would it just be a run-of-the-mill, coming of age family story? I can't decide if it's worth it for me to watch it.
I'll also say that Birdman wasn't all that great. The cinematography was excellent, as were the performances from Norton and Keaton, but as a film... eh.
You can't take that "gimmick" away from it though. It's a huge part of what makes it so unique and special. It has never been done before and likely will never will be again. If Boyhood was a late fall release it would have won more awards. It's summer momentum had virtually disappeared by the Oscars.
Boyhood sucks as much today as it did yesterday.
And that's what is BS about the Oscars. Boyhood is just as good now as it was when it was released- the timing of the release shouldn't impact how many awards it wins.
Serious question: would Boyhood be a great movie without the 12-year filming gimmick? Or would it just be a run-of-the-mill, coming of age family story? I can't decide if it's worth it for me to watch it.
I'll also say that Birdman wasn't all that great. The cinematography was excellent, as were the performances from Norton and Keaton, but as a film... eh.