Yeah, and I'm also practical. Can you paint me a likely scenario where we take the senate in the next president's 1st term? And when I say the next president, I'm assuming it's a Dem, but we could still blow this thing. You and I would both love to abolish the EC. But until we accomplish that, we still need to count 270, and the sad fact is the Dem nominee will likely have to win the general by at least 4-5 points in order to win the EC. If you take the solid red states, that gives Trump 204. You throw in FL, NC and AZ which lean red, and you're at 259. He won IA by 10 points in 2016. Now I get we can argue that Trump's tariffs are hurting IA, but culturally, IA is a Trump state, and that would get him to 265. And he only lost MN by 1% and NV by 2%. So even if PA and MI are back in Dem hands, it's still not a done deal. Trump altered the EC a bit when he turned OH red. The Pubs already had a bit of a house effect in their direction by the addition of the 2 senators being added to every state for EC purposes. So he's in a unique position where he can lose the northeast and west coast by yuge margins, but if he holds states like FL, GA, TX and NC by 1-5 points, he could possibly still win but lose the popular vote by maybe 6-7 points, which has never happened before. So yeah, let's be practical and find a nominee who can perform the best in these 10 states.