WFcatamount22
Well-known member
nah i'm just sick of you stirring the pot for the purposes of start fights on here, Whatamount
How is posting a “breaking news*” article and then siding with Sanders stirring the pot?
nah i'm just sick of you stirring the pot for the purposes of start fights on here, Whatamount
nah i'm just sick of you stirring the pot for the purposes of start fights on here, Whatamount
ETA: I can't quote posts anymore when I post on the website version of the boards, mods. Whenever I try, it inserts multiple posts that I quoted weeks/months ago. Anybody else having issues with this?
How is posting a “breaking news*” article and then siding with Sanders stirring the pot?
Because we've had the same conversation dozens of times on this board. It seems silly that it wouldn't come up among two people discussing presidential viability. Clickbait.
I think Mayor Cory Booker would have been a more attractive candidate for similar reasons I think Mayor Julian Castro would have and I think Mayor Pete is. Establishment Dems haven't done well in the general. There's a real hunger for leaders from outside of Washington. That's why out of all the Presidents in my lifetime, only Bush I spent a lot of time in Washington when he was elected.
My take on Warren's dip is that Sanders' ground team is absolutely crushing in the early states and taking some of her support. He has the most volunteers by almost a factor of two. His texting and calling campaigns have gotten a lot of commitments from people in the "never voted before" or "haven't voted in a long time" groups, which no other candidate is going after.
Here's another piece for cville re: progressives moving towards Sanders over Warren https://www.politico.com/news/2020/...DUW3injn4pFsYDhq7rZCoU1V5-19APAxBrfkXr6SEH7Oc