WakeandBake
Well-known member
nah, rural guys struggle with opinionated, intellectual women who don't defer to men, unless it is their mommy
We get it. Rural and suburban folk didn't really like Hillary. They also wouldn't have liked Warren.
Warren would have done better than Hillary.
Yes. But I'm not sure she could have won.
I voted yesterday and then last night
You are aware that Iowa, Michigan, Kansas, South Dakota, Alabama and Maine all have women governors, right? And that states that have never elected a female governor include New York, Illinois and California while places like Montana, Wyoming, Louisiana, Kentucky, Texas and Oregon all have.
But, yes, I would no doubt be worried if Warren were the nominee she'd lose.
Aside from Kansas, which has a female Democratic governor, the other states that are largely conservative have female Republican governors.
It's that combo of a Dem + female that some people just aren't comfortable with. Trump: "we're not going to have a socialist president, especially a female socialist president."
Hillary was a very sharp candidate with incredible experience. Some people hated her for reasons that are still unclear. Some people continue to rail on her to justify their vote for Trump. In fact, Trump himself continues to rail on her to justify why he is President. At the end of the day, I think she just had too much history from being around so long, and she and Bill had been in the GOP hate machine for so long, some of the sentiment was just entrenched.
I think she just had too much history from being around so long, and she and Bill had been in the GOP hate machine for so long, some of the sentiment was just entrenched.
That was 1 of my issues with Warren, even though I like her personally. Both she and Hillary have that school marm trait that limits their appeal.
That was 1 of my issues with Warren, even though I like her personally. Both she and Hillary have that school marm trait that limits their appeal. I didn't have the same fear with Harris, Klobuchar, Whitmer or Duckworth as #1 or 2 on a ticket.
Completely agree. Is the nation reeling at the thought of Kamala Harris being President. No. Why? Because she comes off as competent and confident and comfortable. She doesn't come off as wonky (Warren) or as someone who places blame for shortcomings on systemic problems (HRC). Part of what we all hate about Trump is his hyper willingness to find faults in institutions or society for his own personality issues - which HRC does to some degree too (albeit, less). Wonky doesn't work well as a man either. Warren also would struggle as being painted as too far to the left. Trump has tried that with Harris - it hasn't gotten traction. It would have with Warren.
Correct assessmentAside from Kansas, which has a female Democratic governor, the other states that are largely conservative have female Republican governors.
It's that combo of a Dem + female that some people just aren't comfortable with. Trump: "we're not going to have a socialist president, especially a female socialist president."
Hillary was a very sharp candidate with incredible experience. Some people hated her for reasons that are still unclear. Some people continue to rail on her to justify their vote for Trump. In fact, Trump himself continues to rail on her to justify why he is President. At the end of the day, I think she just had too much history from being around so long, and she and Bill had been in the GOP hate machine for so long, some of the sentiment was just entrenched.
This
Also this. Although I would say that Hillary comes off as very cold and aloof, where Warren doesn’t.
How the fuck does Warren come off as wonky?
How does somebody whose tagline was "I have a plan for that" come across as policy wonkish?