I think I understand generally where you are coming from, although your statement about a "creator" has me a little confused. I was under the impression you were an atheist, but maybe I'm misremembering/misinterpreting.
In any event, my problem with science and those with a scientific viewpoint isn't with science as such. Science as such is well and good. It's when science says "we've figured it out (or are on the way) and therefore there is no room for God" that the problems start. First of all, only someone with no sense of the history of science would think that we have or will be able to truly figure anything out once and for all. It was barely 100 years ago that scientists believed in the ether and maybe less that, if memory serves, we had a raisin pudding model of the atom. It is incalculably hubristic to think our picture of the world will survive even the next 100 years, much less in perpetuity. Second, even if, one day, we were able to decipher an accurate theory of everything, taking the next step and concluding "and therefore there is no room for God" is, and always will be, a philosophical/theological statement, not a scientific one. And, if based on a theory of everything, it is bad philosophy at that.
Anyway, even if you don't respond, thanks for engaging this far.