• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Biden/Schumer/Pelosi Accountability Thread

POINT STANDS (since it can't have a chair while on strike)!

I'll allow the col to introduce professional and subject matter expert opinions into the record since his evidence is normally... thinner...
 
I like when Angus copies/pastes debates between historians he barely understands, while meanwhile his compadres are trying to forcibly get teachers and students to affirm that the founding fathers were heroes.
 
Q. In fact, those who claim that the American Revolution was a counterrevolution to protect slavery focus on the timing of the Somerset ruling of 1772, which held that slavery wasn’t supported by English common law, and Dunmore’s promise to free slaves who escape their masters.

A. To go from these few facts to create such an enormous argument is a problem. The Somerset decision was limited to England, where there were very few slaves, and it didn’t apply to the Caribbean. The British don’t get around to freeing the slaves in the West Indies until 1833, and if the Revolution hadn’t occurred, might never have done so then, because all of the southern colonies would have been opposed. So supposing the Americans hadn’t broken away, there would have been a larger number of slaveholders in the greater British world who might have been able to prolong slavery longer than 1833. The West Indies planters were too weak in the end to resist abolition. They did try to, but if they had had all those planters in the South still being part of the British Empire with them, that would have made it more difficult for the British Parliament to move toward abolition.
Click to expand...

It's crazy to think the founding fathers couldn't magically predict the future and would worry about the short-term ramifications of the Somerset act. Fighting a war over stamps on playing cards is much more reasonable.
 
deactherunner said:
I like when Angus copies/pastes debates between historians he barely understands, while meanwhile his compadres are trying to forcibly get teachers and students to affirm that the founding fathers were heroes.
Click to expand...

And their beloved Dear Leader thinks that Thomas Jefferson wrote the Constitution. Just another of those alternative facts, I guess.
 
Shooshmoo said:
Anus won't be able to read/understand these articles because he has a small brain and is a small man, but they put the issues these few historians have with the 1619 in proper context (and their primary issue is what Gordon Wood references above):

One thing is clear, any inaccuracy/inaccuracies in the 1619 Project (which is meant to supplement not replace teaching in regular history books) pale in comparison to the anti-CRT, book burning, founding father revering at all costs fascist white washed history Anus and conservatives want to teach.
Click to expand...

Lulz - deaconson requested the ignored facts and inaccuracies in the 1619 project along with the SOURCES. All of the above was provided.

And extra points for your pathetic and flailing attempt to put the "issues these few historians have with the 1619 in proper context". Quality entertainment as always.

Why do you gullible clowns have such a problem admitting you were suckered in on another hoax because it aligned with what you WANT to be true?

Just take the L. It should be second nature to you by now.
 
Colonel Angus said:
Lulz - deaconson requested the ignored facts and inaccuracies in the 1619 project along with the SOURCES. All of the above was provided.

And extra points for your pathetic and flailing attempt to put the "issues these few historians have with the 1619 in proper context". Quality entertainment as always.

Why do you gullible clowns have such a problem admitting you were suckered in on another hoax because it aligned with what you WANT to be true?

Just take the L. It should be second nature to you by now.
Click to expand...

I’ve heard more about the 1619 project from you than from any other media or academic outlet.
 
Colonel Angus said:
Lulz - deaconson requested the ignored facts and inaccuracies in the 1619 project along with the SOURCES. All of the above was provided.

And extra points for your pathetic and flailing attempt to put the "issues these few historians have with the 1619 in proper context". Quality entertainment as always.

Why do you gullible clowns have such a problem admitting you were suckered in on another hoax because it aligned with what you WANT to be true?

Just take the L. It should be second nature to you by now.
Click to expand...

Lulz. I acknowledged your source as the professional opinion that it is. You don't understand the difference between opinion and fact. Attestation and substantiation. You also, quite poorly, dodged producing evidence.
 
Colonel Angus said:
Lulz - deaconson requested the ignored facts and inaccuracies in the 1619 project along with the SOURCES. All of the above was provided.

And extra points for your pathetic and flailing attempt to put the "issues these few historians have with the 1619 in proper context". Quality entertainment as always.

Why do you gullible clowns have such a problem admitting you were suckered in on another hoax because it aligned with what you WANT to be true?

Just take the L. It should be second nature to you by now.
Click to expand...

And, I was correct - you're too stupid to be able to read and understand what I posted or those articles. Pretty sure there was one arguable inaccuracy and the person who wrote it acknowledged the error (or that it could be read in a way she did not intend) and said she would correct it in the subsequent version (sorry, you don't know what subsequent means-- a later version), and that the authors of the letter, including Gordon Wood, fully support the 1619 project and some of them have their own issues with how they've handled slavery/racism in books they've written.

I realize I'm talking to a dumb wall, but maybe you'll get a tenth of this?
 
Last edited:
Shooshmoo said:
And, I was correct - you're too stupid to be able to read and understand what I posted or those articles. Pretty sure there was one arguable inaccuracy and the person who wrote it acknowledged the error (or that it could be read in a way she did not intend) and said she would correct it in the subsequent version (sorry, you don't know what subsequent means-- a later version), and that the authors of the letter, including Gordon Wood, fully support the 1619 project and some of them have their own issues with how they've handled slavery/racism in books they've written.

I realize I'm talking to a dumb wall, but maybe you'll get a tenth of this?
Click to expand...

Just for a moment, imagine you were right in your positions. If so, would you have to write in this tone to another person? I don't get why you're so hateful and angry all of the time. It can't come from a healthy place.
 
WokeandBroke said:
Just for a moment, imagine you were right in your positions. If so, would you have to write in this tone to another person? I don't get why you're so hateful and angry all of the time. It can't come from a healthy place.
Click to expand...
Yes because Brad approaches his board interactions from such a place of respect.
 
Conservatives: "You librul MENSA Tunnels Left idiots are so gullible and stupid - you live in a bubble and don't know a damn thing about how the real world works. Here, let me post this source that I've clearly barely read to show just what morons all of you are. Just take the L like you always do!"

Liberals: "Your source doesn't show what you claim it says, so fuck off."

Conservatives: "Why do you have to be so mean? It must be because you're miserable in real life, because god knows all of the conservatives who post here are so polite and respectful in their comments."
 
Fake news. This is a gop victory against progressives! Nice job lil' donnie jenius!!
 
Nobody would ever have cared about infrastructure if Trump hadn’t introduced the concept.
 
 
Of all the position to choose to complain about expertise the one previous filled by Rick Perry is probably not the best.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top