Excellent thread. Spent my 7am hour updating myself on all this stuff, interesting.
When the best evidence of Bigfoot's existence are the videos such as those in the original post, that does not say much for the existence of Bigfoot.
My thoughts on this.
1. Extraterrestrial Life does exists. The concept that out of the entire universe life only exists on Earth is crazy. The real questions are how advanced are they and how far away are they?
2. UFOs have not come to Earth. ET life exists but it seems improbable that they have the technology to travel the distances it would require to come to Earth or if they did why would they care about us? I also think we have the technology to detect if any UFOs are entering or exiting our atmosphere.
3. Bigfoot doesn't exist. With billions of people on the planet to give us input all we ever seem to see is a shaky video or a fuzzy picture. I think if he existed we would have seen concrete proof by now.
4. The Loch Ness monster might exist or might have existed but probably not. Given that it lives in water the chances of it being seen is much less likely than Bigfoot. They find all kinds of new creatures in the Ocean every year. Seems possible that a unknown type of animal has survived in Loch Ness. I still think with as many people that have searched a relatively small area (21.8 sq miles) over a long period of time we would have seen much more convincing proof by now.
My thoughts on this.
1. Extraterrestrial Life does exists. The concept that out of the entire universe life only exists on Earth is crazy. The real questions are how advanced are they and how far away are they?
2. UFOs have not come to Earth. ET life exists but it seems improbable that they have the technology to travel the distances it would require to come to Earth or if they did why would they care about us? I also think we have the technology to detect if any UFOs are entering or exiting our atmosphere.
3. Bigfoot doesn't exist. With billions of people on the planet to give us input all we ever seem to see is a shaky video or a fuzzy picture. I think if he existed we would have seen concrete proof by now.
4. The Loch Ness monster might exist or might have existed but probably not. Given that it lives in water the chances of it being seen is much less likely than Bigfoot. They find all kinds of new creatures in the Ocean every year. Seems possible that a unknown type of animal has survived in Loch Ness. I still think with as many people that have searched a relatively small area (21.8 sq miles) over a long period of time we would have seen much more convincing proof by now.
I drove through the Redwood forests in Orgeon and Northern CA, and there are a few Bigfoot souvenier stands scattered about. These peeps usually live in trailers and spend most of their time tracking him and collecting samples. Then, they sell the footprint moldings, hair samples, and t-shirts at the souvenier stands to finance their further investigations. Pretty sure none of this could exist if Bigfoot wasn't for real. Plus, I bet all the doubters live in realitvely urban areas on the east coast, or otherwise removed from ground zero. You don't find many haters out in the sticks because they live that shit. Just another day out on the back 40.
My thoughts on this.
1. Extraterrestrial Life does exists. The concept that out of the entire universe life only exists on Earth is crazy. The real questions are how advanced are they and how far away are they?
2. UFOs have not come to Earth. ET life exists but it seems improbable that they have the technology to travel the distances it would require to come to Earth or if they did why would they care about us? I also think we have the technology to detect if any UFOs are entering or exiting our atmosphere.
3. Bigfoot doesn't exist. With billions of people on the planet to give us input all we ever seem to see is a shaky video or a fuzzy picture. I think if he existed we would have seen concrete proof by now.
4. The Loch Ness monster might exist or might have existed but probably not. Given that it lives in water the chances of it being seen is much less likely than Bigfoot. They find all kinds of new creatures in the Ocean every year. Seems possible that a unknown type of animal has survived in Loch Ness. I still think with as many people that have searched a relatively small area (21.8 sq miles) over a long period of time we would have seen much more convincing proof by now.
I drove through the Redwood forests in Orgeon and Northern CA, and there are a few Bigfoot souvenier stands scattered about. These peeps usually live in trailers and spend most of their time tracking him and collecting samples. Then, they sell the footprint moldings, hair samples, and t-shirts at the souvenier stands to finance their further investigations. Pretty sure none of this could exist if Bigfoot wasn't for real. Plus, I bet all the doubters live in realitvely urban areas on the east coast, or otherwise removed from ground zero. You don't find many haters out in the sticks because they live that shit. Just another day out on the back 40.
1- Why is it crazy to think life doesn't exist outside our own planet? Life, particularly sentient life, is an anomaly.
2- If ETs exist, and they are intelligent, why wouldn't they be interested with us, much in the same way we are fascinated by them?
They must be pretty crappy Bigfoot trackers if they can't even get a good photo or video of it. STEP UP YOUR GAME, HILLBILLIES.