After Dino was fired? No. After Bzdoofus was hired? I can believe it.This. Next season will be nothing more than Year 6 of the WF rebuild. Seriously think about that. Who would have thought when we let go of Dino that we'd be rebuilding for 6 fucking years!?
This. Next season will be nothing more than Year 6 of the WF rebuild. Seriously think about that. Who would have thought when we let go of Dino that we'd be rebuilding for 6 fucking years!?
We are 1-7 in conference guys. Talking tourney berths for next year seems extremely premature to me.
This. Next season will be nothing more than Year 6 of the WF rebuild. Seriously think about that. Who would have thought when we let go of Dino that we'd be rebuilding for 6 fucking years!?
It's not all that unrealistic to believe that if a few more bounces go our way, we're at least 4-3 in ACC play and 12-9 overall.
But we aren't, so it's pointless. Besides that, 12-9 overall in late January doesn't place any team on the NCAA bubble.
How Wellman has survived this horrible mismanagement of his department's flagship program for 4+ years is beyond me. The people in charge must enjoy ronnie sucking their dicks a lot, because they sure as fuck aren't paying attention to what is actually going on.
Once again, we have no top 75 players on this roster period. It's not a very talented team at all.
We add three top 100 players to replace Darius, Green, and possibly Rondale. Not exactly losing a lot of integral parts.
Once again, we have no top 75 players on this roster period. It's not a very talented team at all.
We add three top 100 players to replace Darius, Green, and possibly Rondale. Not exactly losing a lot of integral parts.
The September RSCI has Doral Moore at #59 and Bryant Crawford at #87. And John Collins might be most ready to contribute next year.
And we're not asking those players to step in and be immediate star players for us. It's quite possible at least two of them come off the bench next season. That will give us the depth and versatility we need to win.
So, if I understand this correctly, we all acknowledge that the talent level on the current team isn't quite good enough to win a lot of basketball games. The players we have coming in are probably not good enough to start for a team without the required talent to win a lot of basketball games. Their addition, however, will lead to our team winning a lot of basketball games.
Somehow I feel like my comprehension skills are just lacking today due to this head cold. Can somebody please explain to me how we take a less than talented team that is 1-7 in conference, add in players that won't be good enough to start, and become a team that will win a lot of games?