Getting the right coach ultimately pays for the buyout due to increased ticket sales, concessions, etc...yes?
Yeah, like increment tax financing.
Getting the right coach ultimately pays for the buyout due to increased ticket sales, concessions, etc...yes?
I don’t think you know what that word means.
Stanford Athletics doesn't give two shits about academics
Preface: obviously this will not happen.
Say that Manning actually does lead a wild winning streak, and wins the ACCT. Regardless of what happens in the NCAAT, would your feelings regarding firing Manning be swayed?
Personally, I don't think I'd be outraged at keeping Manning at that point. I'd still think that it was bad for the future of the program and would prefer we fire him, but I don't think I'd be too upset with giving him another year.
Edit: Or the field of 64 I suppose. We would almost certainly be one of the play-in teams I'd think.
That’s how he got this job basically. A thoroughly mediocre in the regular season Tulsa team had a miracle run through CUSA and made the tournament. The rest is history.
That’s how he got this job basically. A thoroughly mediocre in the regular season Tulsa team had a miracle run through CUSA and made the tournament. The rest is history.
Unless we ended up as a 16 seed - than no. The play-in games are 2 games with the four 16 seeds and then 2 games with the last four teams to get at-large bids. Wake would be an auto qualifier under the "win out" scenario.
After last night I think Manning gets another year.
After last night I think Manning gets another year.
After last night I think Manning gets another year.
If, IF, that happened, I would support one, AND ONLY ONE, more year.Preface: obviously this will not happen.
Say that Manning actually does lead a wild winning streak, and wins the ACCT. Regardless of what happens in the NCAAT, would your feelings regarding firing Manning be swayed?
Personally, I don't think I'd be outraged at keeping Manning at that point. I'd still think that it was bad for the future of the program and would prefer we fire him, but I don't think I'd be too upset with giving him another year.
Even if we won out and got the ACC's auto-bid, I can't see us as anything higher than an eleventh seed. And, correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't two of the elevens slated for the "first four" too? It at least seems like there's always an eleven/four matchup in the group.Unless we ended up as a 16 seed - than no. The play-in games are 2 games with the four 16 seeds and then 2 games with the last four teams to get at-large bids. Wake would be an auto qualifier under the "win out" scenario.