Rj - do some research and education on what people mean when they talk about abolishing the police. People are here are not responsible for your education, and your reductio ad absurdum responses are not helpful to the thread.
People here want no more police period. No change will be enough. They have stated they no prisons for any reason.
https://www.motherjones.com/crime-justice/2020/06/police-abolition-george-floyd/
"What does this end up looking like on a practical level, say, if my car gets stolen?
A friend of ours, they had their car stolen. The police actually recovered it and arrested the driver. So they were like, “See? We need police.” And I said, “Well, let’s dig a little deeper here. What do we know about the person who got arrested that stole your car?” “Uh, the police said that he’d been arrested a bunch of times and there was drug paraphernalia left in the car?” And I’m like, Hmm. So we tried policing a bunch of times with this guy. Did it prevent your car from getting stolen? No. Is this person stealing cars because they have a drug problem? Probably. Is sending them to jail over and over again fixing their drug problem? No. Okay, if we want to reduce vehicle thefts, the first time that we come in contact with this person, we’ve got to start trying to address what’s driving their problematic behavior."
This is a perfect example of what I've said. Without cops, you don't get your car back and it's stolen.
It also fits the cornerstone of my statement in that it brings in societal that haven't been fixed as my "evolutionary" position is.
That I (and most others here) am for systemic and deep reform isn't enough for the extreme left.