• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

First Charges Filed in Mueller Investigation

 
sailordeac said:
not much different from what I have been saying
Click to expand...

Actually it's very different. I don't think there's one sentence in there about Hillary or Obama working with Russians to conduct a silent coup against Trump. Nothing about uranium one or the Clinton foundation either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ONW
Newenglanddeac said:
Actually it's very different. I don't think there's one sentence in there about Hillary or Obama working with Russians to conduct a silent coup against Trump. Nothing about uranium one or the Clinton foundation either.
Click to expand...

+1
 
Newenglanddeac said:
Actually it's very different. I don't think there's one sentence in there about Hillary or Obama working with Russians to conduct a silent coup against Trump. Nothing about uranium one or the Clinton foundation either.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant to the point. Mueller is not investigating Hillary or Obama.

You, NED have spent an incredible amount of time posting and uncovering nothing about a Trump-Russia collusion. I and others have been pointing out your failures. The Politico article supports us and not you. The Rosenstein press conference supports us and not you. From what we know of Mueller's investigation so far, Mueller supports us and not you.

We have been correct about the Trump-Russia collusion and you have been wrong. Deep in the grip of TDS, you NED have been spectacularly, obstinately, and persistently wrong.

Obama's role in Justice Department and FBI misbehavior and Hillary's crimes have yet to be properly investigated, but let's hope that they will be. There is already plenty of evidence that such investigations will prove to be far more fertile in proving low behavior in high places - not to mention collusion with Russia by the dems - than the meager results obtained from the Trump colluded with Russia mania.
 
It is like trying to come to middle ground with a conspiracy theorist. Reason won't prevail.......so you just point and laugh.
 
sailordeac said:
Irrelevant to the point. Mueller is not investigating Hillary or Obama.

You, NED have spent an incredible amount of time posting and uncovering nothing about a Trump-Russia collusion. I and others have been pointing out your failures. The Politico article supports us and not you. The Rosenstein press conference supports us and not you. From what we know of Mueller's investigation so far, Mueller supports us and not you.

We have been correct about the Trump-Russia collusion and you have been wrong. Deep in the grip of TDS, you NED have been spectacularly, obstinately, and persistently wrong.

Obama's role in Justice Department and FBI misbehavior and Hillary's crimes have yet to be properly investigated, but let's hope that they will be. There is already plenty of evidence that such investigations will prove to be far more fertile in proving low behavior in high places - not to mention collusion with Russia by the dems - than the meager results obtained from the Trump colluded with Russia mania.
Click to expand...

2itrh41.jpg
 
Arguing with sailor is stupid. His brain is mush. He never had a speck of morals. Now he can't differentiate fact from conjecture. So he will just go in circles with his dual devotions of defending the President and defaming those who would defend this country.
 
sailordeac said:
Irrelevant to the point. Mueller is not investigating Hillary or Obama.

You, NED have spent an incredible amount of time posting and uncovering nothing about a Trump-Russia collusion. I and others have been pointing out your failures. The Politico article supports us and not you. The Rosenstein press conference supports us and not you. From what we know of Mueller's investigation so far, Mueller supports us and not you.

We have been correct about the Trump-Russia collusion and you have been wrong. Deep in the grip of TDS, you NED have been spectacularly, obstinately, and persistently wrong.

Obama's role in Justice Department and FBI misbehavior and Hillary's crimes have yet to be properly investigated, but let's hope that they will be. There is already plenty of evidence that such investigations will prove to be far more fertile in proving low behavior in high places - not to mention collusion with Russia by the dems - than the meager results obtained from the Trump colluded with Russia mania.
Click to expand...

“Probably”
 
sailordeac said:
Irrelevant to the point. Mueller is not investigating Hillary or Obama.

You, NED have spent an incredible amount of time posting and uncovering nothing about a Trump-Russia collusion. I and others have been pointing out your failures. The Politico article supports us and not you. The Rosenstein press conference supports us and not you. From what we know of Mueller's investigation so far, Mueller supports us and not you.

We have been correct about the Trump-Russia collusion and you have been wrong. Deep in the grip of TDS, you NED have been spectacularly, obstinately, and persistently wrong.

Obama's role in Justice Department and FBI misbehavior and Hillary's crimes have yet to be properly investigated, but let's hope that they will be. There is already plenty of evidence that such investigations will prove to be far more fertile in proving low behavior in high places - not to mention collusion with Russia by the dems - than the meager results obtained from the Trump colluded with Russia mania.
Click to expand...

Any post that so prominently features the phrase deep state is a serious post.
 
birdman said:
Any post that so prominently features the phrase deep state is a serious post.
Click to expand...

Are you serious? The expression "deep state" does not appear prominently in the post you cited. In fact, it does not appear at all.

Are you sure you are OK. TDS is a bitch.

Are you trying to be sarcastic, or just incoherent?
 
Last edited:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/19/o...ell-public-for-fear-of-label-as-taking-sides/

It is impossible to get a straight answer from these people..

(A)Did the Russians start back in 2013 as is now claimed or not, Jeh?

(B)If so,what concern for the 2016 election outcome can you possibly claim?

(C) If so,why did President Obama take the time to publicly and specifically “refute” any claims of election hacking..going so far as to warn Trump that he better be ready to accept the results of the election?

Democrats have become untethered from any pretense of Reason. Sad and angry for this shit-show they have pedaled to their trusting constituency. They better hope that they can somehow keep the lies and charade alive or else that constituency is going to roast their asses for this massive scandal
 
sailordeac said:
Are you serious? The expression "deep state" does not appear prominently in the post you cited. In fact, it does not appear at all.

Are you sure you are OK. TDS is a bitch.

Are you trying to be sarcastic, or just incoherent?
Click to expand...

Must have quoted the wrong post. Still, the ideas are all there. A random sampling of yours and moonz’s post gives about a 25% chance of find the phrase, so, oops.
 
For Trump we have an active investigation that has resulted in arrests and indictments including Trump's former campaign manager, yet popeye has concluded that they have nothing.

On the other hand, popeye creates obstruction charges related to a congressional investigation out of whole cloth when congress didn't even charge HRC with contempt, along with his fantasies about the Clinton Foundation being a slush fund.

I am glad he has a delusional conspiracy theorist like Lectro to now keep him company.
 
Why didn’t Obama do anything? Two pretty big reasons.
One republican congress basically told him to fuck off.
Two Obama knows how dumb half this country is, you fucking rubes believe Benghazi, Pizza gate, gay frogs and any other asinine bullshit that gets thrown out, if he had done anything you dumb fucks would still be talking about deep State and Obama secret army with somewhat of a better case because he interfered during an election.
 
Lectro said:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/19/o...ell-public-for-fear-of-label-as-taking-sides/

It is impossible to get a straight answer from these people..

(A)Did the Russians start back in 2013 as is now claimed or not, Jeh? Yes

(B)If so,what concern for the 2016 election outcome can you possibly claim? That Trump benefited from 3 years of Russia interference.

(C) If so,why did President Obama take the time to publicly and specifically “refute” any claims of election hacking..going so far as to warn Trump that he better be ready to accept the results of the election? Because he had no evidence of election hacking at the time

Democrats have become untethered from any pretense of Reason. Sad and angry for this shit-show they have pedaled to their trusting constituency. They better hope that they can somehow keep the lies and charade alive or else that constituency is going to roast their asses for this massive scandal
Click to expand...

This isn't difficult.
 
Chris, you are in first stages of having to eat an enormous Something-Burger.

It’s going to be painful but you have many of us who will console and help you as you slowly digest the cold hard truth of Democratic Party Corruption.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top