Regardless of situation? 99.9% of those coaching changes are relatively normal. This situation was extreme from the start. Can you name one coach at this level that was told to completely rebuild the program in a completely different 180° direction, but told to retain all coaches, players, and existing recruits? I'm not aware of one.
The notion that "no other coach would survive it" is sort of funny given he was told winning wasn't important for the first 2 years. How many coaches are even told that? Probably only after a scandal...which is how Wellman treated the situation.
And hell, I'm not even saying he should stay, all I've said is he blew it last night on the road with a team of his experienced players and if things don't change ASAP in that regard, he needs to go. Sorry it's not "fuck Bz" enough you.
According to basketball reference's rating system there has only been one non-buzz coached Wake team in the last 25 years worse than this one (06-07). And if we are discounting years 1 and 2, buzz still has two of the five worst seasons of the past 35 years of Wake Basketball.
What does "lose their entire starting lineup this year" have to do with anything? We lost our entire TEAM in Years 1 and 2.Are you serious? Miami lost their entire starting lineup this year and are ranked higher in KenPom than we are in Year 4 of Buzz. You are delusional.
It's called respect, know what that means? It means, any hired coach at Wake deserves to get a fair shot at Wake to win under a fair set of conditions.
He was not hired into a fair set of conditions by any means. He was asked to do things most other coaches aren't asked to do, working with a set of players that personality wise fit Dino who is the polar opposite, and told winning doesn't matter. The only way to fairly assess his performance at Wake was after the transition was over, with his players, and when winning mattered to the AD.
Pointing to Colorado is irrelevant to his performance at Wake. Pointing to years 1 and 2 is irrelevant given Wellman's stupidity. Putting much meaning on Year 3 is weak given it was with a team of freshmen. This is the first year that has real meaning at Wake as far as winning and we should just let it play out. If he's the coach you think he is and I suspect he is, then the poor data/results will happen this year....like last night....and changes will be made.
I really don't get why it's so hard to understand. I've been saying the same thing over and over again.
What does "lose their entire starting lineup this year" have to do with anything? We lost our entire TEAM in Years 1 and 2.
Regardless of situation? 99.9% of those coaching changes are relatively normal. This situation was extreme from the start. Can you name one coach at this level that was told to completely rebuild the program in a completely different 180° direction, but told to retain all coaches, players, and existing recruits? I'm not aware of one.
The notion that "no other coach would survive it" is sort of funny given he was told winning wasn't important for the first 2 years. How many coaches are even told that? Probably only after a scandal...which is how Wellman treated the situation.
And hell, I'm not even saying he should stay, all I've said is he blew it last night on the road with a team of his experienced players and if things don't change ASAP in that regard, he needs to go. Sorry it's not "fuck Bz" enough you.
Holy shit. This jackass is in his 7th season coaching major conference basketball and this is the only one that should be used when evaluating him. That is quite possibly the dumbest fucking thing I have ever heard.
2-48 on the road in his last 50 conference road games. It really is a stunning statistic.
Pointing to Colorado is irrelevant to his performance at Wake.
What do you mean it isn't true? We brought him in to completely change the program. His personality and style is 180° from Dino's. He was asked to rebuild WITH all of Dino's players, coaches, and recruits.....a group of which he did not fit in with personality wise. He was asked to change recruiting which had to have caused recruiting problems out of the gate (and obviously did). Wellman repeatedly said, winning didn't matter...and several posters have backed that up internally.This isn't true. But even if it is it's just evidence that Wellman should be fired in addition to [Redacted].
What does "lose their entire starting lineup this year" have to do with anything? We lost our entire TEAM in Years 1 and 2.
No, which is one reason I thought it was a stupid hire and said so in Year 1, and especially after I dug up the rebound stats (yes, that was me) that we now all point to because that suggested a reason for all the losing.Can you name another ACC, or high major program, that hired a coach on a 3 year losing streak? I can't.
Can you name another ACC, or high major program, that hired a coach on a 3 year losing streak? I can't. And let's not forget all of the transfers under [Redacted] at both Colorado and Wake. Was Colorado a program that was in need of a culture shake up? So I damn sure think that his time at Colorado is relevant.
No, which is one reason I thought it was a stupid hire and said so in Year 1, and especially after I dug up the rebound stats (yes, that was me) that we now all point to because that suggested a reason for all the losing.
However, it is in fact irrelevant to his performance AT WAKE which is how I judge ALL coaches after they are hired. A loss at Colorado does not go on his Wake record as far as I know.
No, which is one reason I thought it was a stupid hire and said so in Year 1, and especially after I dug up the rebound stats (yes, that was me) that we now all point to because that suggested a reason for all the losing.
However, it is in fact irrelevant to his performance AT WAKE which is how I judge ALL coaches after they are hired. A loss at Colorado does not go on his Wake record as far as I know.
I agree with almost everything you're saying, so how could I be spinning things? All those failures will likely result in an insufficient W-L record this year and he'll be gone. Things will have played out. You're reading spin into it.Because Larranaga is winning games with a completely different and young team this year, including a game AT Carolina. The point is that any coach may have struggled with the situation [Redacted] inherited, but it is safe to say that there is not a single coach who would have struggled quite as badly (Buzz inherited veterans [including starters CJ Harris, Gary Clark, and Ty Walker], if you remember, and a highly ranked group of freshmen [including Travis McKie and heavy rotation players Chase Fischer, our savior Daniel Green, JT Terrell, Carson Desrosiers, etc.) or with as little class as was the case with Buzz's rebuild.
Also, we didn't lose our entire team - they either transferred due to our staff's conduct and personal wishes (Tony C [he was named CMM's backup before his family issues], Ari [well-documented, by now], and Carson), because they were not ACC caliber (Anthony and Chase), or because their legal situations likely forced both their and our AD's hands (JT, Tony W, and Melvin).
If our situation is so different, then name a rebuild (not engineered by Buzz) that has gone this poorly given our roster composition at the time, defections, and subsequent recruiting efforts. I'll keep my mind open if you can find another program that has failed as badly as ours amidst a coaching transition.
You're just spinning a situation that doesn't improve with spin. Buzz has had plenty of time to recruit (he's failed to recruit ACC-caliber talent, as well as positions of need...not to mention his utter inability to manage class-size and scholarship allocation with an eye toward the program's future) and both coach and develop teams instilled with his "culture" and "system" - whatever they may be - and he's objectively failed at every possible level.