Watched the second interview too. Daughters were justifiably upset by the disclosures and rightfully so, but also thought the interview was even more scripted and hamfisted to push a narrative and the Fox brand even more than the first interview. Originally didn't know anything about the Duggars, so was shocked by some of their rules (no "front" hugging, no handholding before engagement, no kissing before marriage). The troubling stuff was that parents had knowledge of three incidents of molestation over 16 months before they sought help. Have no idea why publicist would think disclosing that would be helpful. Or a 14 year old boy molesting his 5 year old sister.
Second segment focused on the cops and media. Get the Fox mantra that libs are bad and conservatives are good, but nobody thinks that being disgusted by unwanted touching by adolescents is a function of political ideology. Think that it was rseasonable for the Duggars to be upset about the leaks, but there are FOIA laws too so they may have come out eventually anyway. If there was no bad behavior, there's no story. Nobody forced them to become reality stars either. They could have lived the exact same lives and none of it would have become newsworthy. Know nothing about the show and its ratings/economics, but Duggars will become conservative cult heroes like Bristol Palin, Paula Dean, or Duck Dynasty. Just don't see advertisers lining up to fund a show featuring a family who deliberately ignored child abuse, no matter how much dedicated viewers hate liberal media.
