wow thats the pot calling the kettle black.
Meanwhile, we have a 100+ page thread on being shot by a uniformed police officer. Not so much on the supermajority of populations being born into fatherless homes. But when it comes to terrorism, suddenly we get really and conveniently into percentage of impact. But "we're cutting through the bullshit" and "we're good people." Just ask. Or don't.
What's your plan to decrease the number of children born into fatherless homes?
"Military prosecutors have reached into a section of military law seldom used since World War II in the politically fraught case against Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the soldier held prisoner for years by the Taliban after leaving his post in Afghanistan.
Observers wondered for months if Bergdahl would be charged with desertion after the deal brokered by the U.S. to bring him home. He was — but he was also charged with misbehavior before the enemy, a much rarer offense that carries a stiffer potential penalty in this case."
It is an interesting phrase. The similarities between Sgt. Bergdahl's situation and federal immigration law are also interesting.
I totally agree. This is a binary situation that doesn't need a nuanced resolution.
We're on the same page. Have a great day.
I thought you were being sarcastic.