BarcaDeac
Well-known member
You can click on the tweets and the journalists usually provide a brief bio of who they are, what they do and who they work for.
This is a message board. Post it in the message. Hey a CNN journalist has this to say:
You can click on the tweets and the journalists usually provide a brief bio of who they are, what they do and who they work for.
This is a message board. Post it in the message. Hey a CNN journalist has this to say:
Ok, but the rest of us find you and new England's twitter feed super weird, even weirder when you expect us to know who all these random people are
You don’t know Schindler and Witte’s birthdays???!!!!
A long but good read from WAPO today. It will make you feel really good about the direction of our country.
"Nearly a year into his presidency, Trump continues to reject the evidence that Russia waged an assault on a pillar of American democracy and supported his run for the White House.
The result is without obvious parallel in U.S. history, a situation in which the personal insecurities of the president — and his refusal to accept what even many in his administration regard as objective reality — have impaired the government’s response to a national security threat. The repercussions radiate across the government.
Rather than search for ways to deter Kremlin attacks or safeguard U.S. elections, Trump has waged his own campaign to discredit the case that Russia poses any threat and he has resisted or attempted to roll back efforts to hold Moscow to account.
His administration has moved to undo at least some of the sanctions the previous administration imposed on Russia for its election interference, exploring the return of two Russian compounds in the United States that President Barack Obama had seized — the measure that had most galled Moscow. Months later, when Congress moved to impose additional penalties on Moscow, Trump opposed the measures fiercely.
Trump has never convened a Cabinet-level meeting on Russian interference or what to do about it, administration officials said. Although the issue has been discussed at lower levels at the National Security Council, one former high-ranking Trump administration official said there is an unspoken understanding within the NSC that to raise the matter is to acknowledge its validity, which the president would see as an affront.
Trump’s stance on the election is part of a broader entanglement with Moscow that has defined the first year of his presidency. He continues to pursue an elusive bond with Putin, which he sees as critical to dealing with North Korea, Iran and other issues. “Having Russia in a friendly posture,” he said last month, “is an asset to the world and an asset to our country.”
His position has alienated close American allies and often undercut members of his Cabinet — all against the backdrop of a criminal probe into possible ties between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin.
This account of the Trump administration’s reaction to Russia’s interference and policies toward Moscow is based on interviews with more than 50 current and former U.S. officials, many of whom had senior roles in the Trump campaign and transition team or have been in high-level positions at the White House or at national security agencies. Most agreed to speak only on the condition of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the subject."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/grap...prussia:homepage/story&utm_term=.dc05aaae3e3b
Yeah, once the pissing stories get out in public then people stop acting reasonably. I think most interesting would be if that dossier was just made up political trash and its creation actually caused the downfall of our country. I mean put yourself in Trump's shoes if that was actually made up, you'd probably react as he has reacted.
schiff's tweets