You're an idiot. The St. Louis Dispatch has been reporting on the conflict of interest between Claire and her husbands investing for years. If you google "Claire McCaskill husband" you can find lots of older reputable articles, with some of the references going back to 2006. You might also check out the Kansas City Star's article:
https://www.kansascity.com/news/politics-government/article215234680.html
I had actually already read that article, and noted:
"There’s no evidence that McCaskill played any part in directing federal funds to businesses affiliated with her husband.
The senator does not sit on committees that oversee the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the agencies that award affordable housing contracts and loans to developers and pay out the subsidies.
She has voted for some massive government spending bills that would have benefited affordable housing programs, but she also voted against others."
I guess in this case, you are psyched about her voted against affordable housing programs, but pissed that she voted for some as well -- how dare she!
Also noted this:
"Shepard’s investment in affordable housing projects dates back to the 1970s, long predating his relationship with McCaskill, who he married in 2002.
Wyche provided data to show Shepard is far less involved in government housing projects than he was before he met McCaskill in 2001.
The total number of government housing projects that Shepard’s company Sugar Creek listed in 1999 was 285, Wyche said.
Shepard was the general partner in nearly all of the projects he was involved in back then, seeking investors and overseeing the design, construction and daily property management.
As of 2017, Shepard had become a limited partner in most of the 164 housing projects he was involved in, serving only as an investor, according to Wyche.
“Joseph Shepard’s work with federal affordable housing projects has decreased almost 40 percent since he met Claire in 2001, years before she was elected to the United States Senate,” Wyche said in a statement. “He is now a limited partner in the vast majority of these investments, meaning that he has absolutely no say in how the projects are run and any money that he receives is limited by law.”"