Timberdeac
Member
I get pandering, but to state the play wasn't reviewed is either a inexcusable mistake or an international lie.
Absolutely true statement. These days a big lie is preferable to small minded people than the truth
I get pandering, but to state the play wasn't reviewed is either a inexcusable mistake or an international lie.
On onside kicks to the sideline, of course.I'll never understand why the receiving team just doesn't go after the ball and simply punch it out of bounds
I'll never understand why the receiving team just doesn't go after the ball and simply punch it out of bounds
I'll never understand why the receiving team just doesn't go after the ball and simply punch it out of bounds
A plan based upon getting a clean hit on a bouncing oblong ball is not a good plan.
Absolutely true statement. These days a big lie is preferable to small minded people than the truth
The tarheels played the onside kick against us perfectly, ball was up in the air and one of their guys swatted it out of bounds and we never had a chance. This kick never really got high enough in the air to try and swat it though, it was a good kick and we got soooooooo lucky.
I get pandering, but to state the play wasn't reviewed is either a inexcusable mistake or an intentional lie.
A plan based upon getting a clean hit on a bouncing oblong ball is not a good plan.
It's also a penalty
I get pandering, but to state the play wasn't reviewed is either a inexcusable mistake or an intentional lie.
It was the right call but Man it was very close. I think if they hadn’t ruled on field it was illegal - they would have let it stand if they ruled on field it went 10 yards. It was one of those calls that is too close/too important for game to be overturned from ruling on the field. I think we all know what would have happened if State had ball at 45 with 40 seconds left and 2 timeouts. Board would be in full meltdown mode now.