Deacsfan27
Well-known member
Seriously, what would it take for JHMD or the likes to turn on Trump? Pedophilia appears to be something they dislike.
Seriously, what would it take for JHMD or the likes to turn on Trump? Pedophilia appears to be something they dislike.
Seriously, what would it take for JHMD or the likes to turn on Trump? Pedophilia appears to be something they dislike.
"Grandpa Doofus, how did you spend your Friday nights?"
Seriously, what would it take for JHMD or the likes to turn on Trump? Pedophilia appears to be something they dislike.
As he posts on a message board on friday night.
Of course, you are a #micro-old, so its not like you (or I) have anything better to do.
You cool with news outlets being shut out the way they were today? And before you get snarky, that is a serious question. I would assume you are as horrified as I am, but maybe not.
I was snarky before you were out of bed this morning.
What did you expect of this Presidency? He was sent here to deliver the FU from the half of the country the ptb forgot. This is what happens when you don't listen to people for 25 years. They notice, and send yout Donald Trump.
That's not an answer. I believe that if a free and open press, no matter the slant or yellow journalism or whatever, was good enough for the last 44 Presidents, it would be good enough for this one. And I would think that again, such an idea would be horrifying to you.
It makes me sick to think that things that matter, like a fair press, would be so casually discarded. If FoxNews, the Wall Street Journal, and other outlets are blocked by the next Democratic administration, that sucks as well.
Yep. I'm finally all in. I think Donald could advocate rounding up and killing all liberals and the press and most republicans would say "well at least Hillary didn't get elected."
That's not an answer. I believe that if a free and open press, no matter the slant or yellow journalism or whatever, was good enough for the last 44 Presidents, it would be good enough for this one. And I would think that again, such an idea would be horrifying to you.
It makes me sick to think that things that matter, like a fair press, would be so casually discarded. If FoxNews, the Wall Street Journal, and other outlets are blocked by the next Democratic administration, that sucks as well.
You have a far different level of respect for the contemporary press than i. I do not view them (collectively) as an institution that has held up their end of the bargain for society. I would share your concern about their exclusion if I shared your belief in their job performance. First part is moot to me.
So you don't believe in freedom of the press.
Wow.
Yes. That's exactly what I said. Nailed it.
Where was the press during WMD? ACA? I would be more offended on their behalf if they actually performed their important function. To what do we owe your considerable reverence for their job performance? They spent the last 18 months trying to get Hillary elected and managed to miss the only story they claimed to be covering: look no further than who the President is that kicked out a few reporters. Nice job, idiots.
Nils Bildt sent a short e-mail to DN late earlier on Friday, explaining why he was given the title of ”Swedish defense and national security advisor”: ”I appeared on Bill O'Reillys's show on Fox News. The title was chosen by Fox News's editor – I had no personal control over what title they chose. I am an independent analyst based in the USA”, he wrote.