cville deac
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2011
- Messages
- 15,268
- Reaction score
- 915
Furyk was Tom Watson all over again. Playing Tiger 36 in one day was idiocy just like Watson playing Phil 36 was. Sitting Finau and Fowler? Almost as bad as Watson benching Spieth and Reed. Then there's the old-man syndrome striking once again - overvaluing "experience" in the Ryder Cup for Captain's Picks and benching youth. Koepka/Finau put down Rose/Rahm and then sit? Seriously?
Interesting to note that both Ryder Cups were essentially lost in the first afternoon foursomes. Blanked this year, only a half point the Watson year. Almost the same spread overall in the losses, and each had questionable decisions along with complete head-scratchers like playing Mickelson/DeChambeau making up their foursomes groups.
Agree with everything else except for Fowler. He only sat 1 session and sucked when he was in there. He was in the water multiple times in the 1 session where he and DJ won and lost his other 3. His RC record is now 3-7-5. I see no reason for Furyk to have played him in the 5th session.
Edited to add that I'm also mellowing a bit on Furyk. I still don't get putting Phil and Bubba out there in 4somes, though Bubba and Webb did win 1 on Saturday. But I think his main problem was created not in the last week but when he picked Tiger, Phil and Bryson who are all reasonably long and wild off the tee. He essentially had a team mostly filled with bomb and gouge guys on a layout that resembled a 1990s US Open with narrow fairways and punitive rough. It was hard finding 8 guys on that team who would be good in 4somes. Add to that he had nobody who wanted to play with Reed and probably only Webb who was willing to play with Bubba, and Tiger was sleepwalking out there. Furyk was probably pressured into taking Tiger, Phil and Bryson when Kisner, Kuchar and Schauffele would have been better suited to that course.
Last edited: