DeaconBrews
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2011
- Messages
- 44,987
- Reaction score
- 3,147
Don't worry I don't think he will play in the ACC or Sec
Do you know him in some capacity?
Don't worry I don't think he will play in the ACC or Sec
Don't worry I don't think he will play in the ACC or Sec
Who the fuck said anything about losing faith in Manning? My point was: You can't look at this in a vacuum, for the same reason that you always spout in Dino/Bz arguments. Even if losing a top 75 player was fine and not something we should worry about (it is not fine, and we should worry about it), it matters that we're replacing him with one of two guys who have never even sort of sniffed the top 75.
It's okay to introduce nuance into opinions. I'm not saying we need to fire Manning yesterday; I'm just saying that losing Mitchell is bad, and we should be concerned. We want open scholarships, and most seem to agree with that, but Moto and Mitchell (two of maybe four players on our roster who were decently rated out of high school) weren't the places to start. I can forgive him for Moto, because by most accounts Moto was being a douche, but Mitchell hurts. To pretend otherwise doesn't mean you're keeping a level head or whatever the fuck-- it just means you're not paying attention. The fact that, in your posts on this thread, you've admitted ignorance supports that.
Weren't there reports that Mitchell was hobbling badly the last few games of this season?
So I must not be paying attention because I think less highly than you do of a top 75, at best, 3rd point guard? That's not nuance, that's you stating an opinion as if it were a fact. You failing to realize that 247 has two ranking systems, and that only the index has Shelton in the top 100, is an example of your own ignorance, not mine. I guess you need to worry enough for the both of us.
It absolutely would have been nice to hold on to them but I just don't know what you expect a guy to do if a kid feels otherwise?
3rd PG? Are you talking about on our team? That's ridiculous if so.
Can someone remind me again as to why we've decided that our slashing PG, shooting 8% from 3, should move to the 2 spot?
My money is on Illinois, but I also wouldn't be surprised to see him at State or UVA. :rulz:
Truth. Mitchell may be a better PG, but CMM was going to give us little to nothing at SG. I don't think this really hurts in terms of immediate success (or in our case, lack of). It is concerning that DM couldn't hang on to our only top rated recruit, but this specifically won't change much. Let's just hope that he recruits some great classes the next two years (something we have no evidence he can do).
Wasn't Illinois sniffing around him during the coaching search ?
Do you know him in some capacity?
I don't really think it matters when judging Manning. Like I said on the other thread we kept everyone last time and we were all pumped. We promptly suffered through four years of awfulness.